Name: The Third Battle of Petersburg
Other Names: The Breakthrough, Final Ninth Corps Assaults, Fort Gregg, Fort Whitworth
Location: City of Petersburg
Campaign: Appomattox Campaign (March-April 1865)1
Date:April 2, 1865
Principal Commanders: Lt. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant [US]; Gen. Robert E. Lee [CS]
Forces Engaged: Armies
Estimated Casualties: 7,750 total (US 3,500; CS 4,250)
Description: With Confederate defeat at Five Forks on April 1, Grant and Meade ordered a general assault against the Petersburg lines by II, IX, VI and XXIV Corps on April 2. A heroic defense of Fort Gregg by a handful of Confederates prevented the Federals from entering the city that night. Lt. Gen. A.P. Hill was killed trying to reach his troops in the confusion. After dark, Lee ordered the evacuation of Petersburg and Richmond. Grant had achieved one of the major military objectives of the war: the capture of Petersburg, which led to the fall of Richmond, the Capitol of the Confederacy.
Result: Union victory2
Full Summary:
April 2, 1865: The Third Battle of Petersburg
On April 2, 1865, 150 years ago today, the Third (and last) Battle of Petersburg took place, concluding with the evacuation of Richmond and Petersburg after 9 ½ long months and the end of the Siege of Petersburg. Two main attacks were scheduled for 4 am in the morning on the Ninth Corps (Parke) and Sixth Corps (Wright) fronts. All other commands were to be held in readiness to support any breakthroughs made in the main assaults.
Before we get to the four main combats during the day (The Breakthrough, Battle of Ft. Mahone, Battle of Fort Gregg, and Battle of Sutherland’s Station), let’s take a step back and look at what happened on April 1, 1865, the day before. If you’ve been following along on this journey with me, you’ll have read my coverage of the Battle of Five Forks. At that battle, Phil Sheridan’s Cavalry and Gouverneur K. Warren’s Fifth Corps had routed a joint infantry/cavalry command under Major General George Pickett, driving them west and away from Robert E. Lee’s main army. To make matters worse for the Confederates, Lee had tried to reinforce Pickett with three additional infantry brigades, but they had failed to make it in time to factor into the battle. All of these troops sent west to deal with Sheridan meant Lee’s main lines surrounding Petersburg along with the Boydton Plank Road and White Oak Road lines to the southwest were extremely thin.
Ulysses S. Grant knew this every bit as well as Lee did. Grant summarized the overall situation on the night of April 1 in his official report:
“On the morning of the 1st of April General Sheridan, re-enforced by General Warren, drove the enemy back on Five Forks, where, late in the evening, he assaulted and carried his strongly fortified position, capturing all his artillery and between 5,000 and 6,000 prisoners. About the close of this battle Bvt. Major General Charles Griffin relieved Major-General Warren in command of the Fifth Corps. The report of this reached me after night-fall. Some apprehensions filled my mind lest the enemy might desert his lines during the night, and by falling upon General Sheridan before assistance could reach him, drive him from his position and open the way for retreat. To guard against this, General Miles’ division of Humphreys’ corps was sent to re-enforce him, and a bombardment was commenced and kept up until 4 o’clock in the morning (April 2), when an assault was ordered on the enemy’s lines.”
As he mentions above, once Grant heard of the results at Five Forks he ordered an assault all along the Petersburg lines at 4 am. The truth, as it always is, was a bit more complicated than that. Though Grant did indeed want to assault all along the lines, and immediately that evening rather than at 4 am, his army and corps commanders faced realities on the ground. Humphreys and Ord on the left center didn’t feel like they could successfully attack with their forces. Neither did Godfrey Weitzel and the 8,000 men he could spare north of the James. Sheridan, and with him the Fifth Corps, were expected to move to cut off any Confederate retreat on the roads leading west from Petersburg south of the Appomattox River. This left two corps in the center, the Ninth under Parke and the Sixth under Wright, who indicated any chance of success.
Around 4 pm on the afternoon of April 1 (OR XLVI, P3, p. 422), Meade ordered them both to prepare for an assault in 12 hours’ time, also noting that Ord would help. As the night wore on, however, orders quickly changed as Grant reacted to developments out on Sheridan’s flank. Grant began to worry that Lee would evacuate Petersburg and Richmond to concentrate on Sheridan’s somewhat isolated forces. As a result, Meade received a dispatch from Grant at 8:35 pm on the night of April 1 instructing an immediate artillery bombardment and probing by skirmishers with an attack to follow soon after (OR XLVI, P3, p. 397):
“Captain Hudson has just returned from Sheridan. Sheridan has captured everything before him. He has Steuart’s and two other brigade wagon trains, &c., and is pushing now. Humphreys must push now, or everything will leave his front and be concentrated against Sheridan. Inform Parke of this and tell him to be on the watch to go in.”
This telegram left Meade somewhat confused, and probably more than a bit exasperated. He had earlier ordered Parke and Wright to schedule attacks on their fronts at 4 am April 2, with the places and type of attacks left completely up to them. Now Grant was telling him to have Humphreys’ Second Corps assault and have Parke be ready to follow up rather than assault directly. Meade quickly shot back a message to Grant at 8:40 pm, asking for clarification (OR XLVI, P3, p. 397):
“Your dispatch says, ‘Humphreys is to push now.’ Do you mean he is to attack to-night? Orders were sent to both Wright and Parke to attack to-morrow at 4 a. m. These orders were peremptory, no discretion being left to them except as to point of attack and formation of troops. Your last dispatch says, ‘Parke should be notified to watch.’ Do you mean his orders are to be changed?”
Grant just as quickly answered, with Meade receiving the message at 8:56 pm (OR XLVI, P3, p. 397):
“Generals Wright and Parke should both be directed to feel for a chance to get through the enemy’s lines at once, and if they can get through should push on to-night. All our batteries might be opened at once without waiting for preparing assaulting columns. Let the corps commanders know the result on the left, and that it is still being pushed.”
So that was that. Parke and Wright were dutifully notified by Meade to open at once with artillery and probe with skirmishers, looking for an opening to attack immediately, rather than follow his original orders to assault at 4 am. Ultimately however, after some back and forth, it was ultimately decided just to stick with the 4 am assault, and Grant acquiesced in this decision.
Ninth Corps commander John G. Parke held the Union lines south of the Appomattox River to just west of the Jerusalem Plank Road and Fort Sedgwick. Sixth Corps commander Horatio Wright continued this line to the area where the Fifth Offensive took place in September-October 1864 near Peebles’ Farm. Each commander was given discretion as to the size and location of his attack(s). Parke, oddly, picked the strongest Confederate location on his lines, Fort Mahone, to be the target of his assault. He left Willcox’s Division to hold the far left and make a demonstration east of Petersburg, while he concentrated Potter and Hartranft on either side of Jerusalem Plank Road, allowing them to maintain proper direction in the pre-dawn darkness. Preparations proceeded throughout the night. Wright chose to concentrate all three of his divisions in a massive and narrow attack which would proceed northwest from Fort Fisher and Fort Welch, the rest of his lines held by skirmishers and artillery. He was confident his corps would “make the fur fly” (OR XLVI, P3, p. 423) and quickly capture the Confederate intrenchments when they stepped off to the attack. By morning, both corps were ready. The final battles for Petersburg were about to begin.
Ninth Corps Takes Fort Mahone But Stalls
After John G. Parke received orders from George Meade to attack the enemy’s works at 4 am on the morning of April 2, 1865, he quickly issued his own detailed orders to the Ninth Corps (OR XLVI, P2, p. 429):
“In accordance with instructions from the major-general commanding the army the following orders are issued:
An assault upon the enemy’s work in front of Fort Sedgwick will be made at 4 a. m. to-morrow by the Second and Third Divisions and the First Brigade of the First Division.
I. Brigadier-General Hartranft, commanding Third Division, will mass his division in rear of the line between Fort Sedgwick and Fort Rice by 3 a. m.
II. Major-General Potter, commanding Second Division, will withdraw his division from the line and mass it in rear and to the left of Fort Sedgwick and on the left of the Third Division at the same time.
III. Major-General Willcox, commanding First Division, will withdraw his First Brigade, Colonel Harriman commanding, from the line and mass it on the right of the Third Division at the same time.
IV. Major-General Willcox and Major-General Potter will leave their picket-line out and garrisons in the forts.
V. At 4 a. m. the entire picket will advance, endeavoring to hold all ground gained and the assaulting columns will charge. Strong pioneer parties, provided with spades and axes, will be arranged by the commanders of divisions.
VI. Major-General Willcox will hold his other two brigades in readiness to advance upon the enemy’s work in his front on receipt of orders. They will not be withdrawn from the line till further orders.
VII. Quartermaster’s, commissary of subsistence, and medical departments will make their dispositions accordingly.
VIII. After 3.30 a. m. corps headquarters will be at the Avery house, Third Division headquarters.”
Parke, as I mentioned earlier, faced some uncertainty as to when he was supposed to attack. Here’s his view of the situation on the night of April 1 into the morning of April 2 from his official report, including preparations for the 4 am attack (OR XLVI, P1, pp. 1015-1016):
“At 4.50 p.m. April 1 I received orders from army headquarters, through Captain Worth, directing me to assault together, and, after fully examining the grounds, substantially the same arrangements for the assault were made as had been previously made for the assault ordered for the morning of [March] 31st. At 9.50 p.m. orders were received by telegraph from General Meade directing me to at once open with all the artillery in my front, push forward skirmishers, and follow them with columns of assault. While arrangements were being made to carry out these orders they were modified by further instructions withdrawing the orders for instant attack, and making assault contingent on developments of weakness on the part of the enemy. We opened artillery and threw forward a strong skirmish line along the whole front. The enemy was found prepared and in full force with the exception of in front of the Second Brigade, Second Division, Brigadier General S. G. Griffin’s, between Forts Hays and Howard, when General Griffin, by a well-planned rush, succeeded in surprising and capturing about half a mile of the enemy’s picket-line, taking prisoners 8 officers and 241 men, but further movements disclosed the enemy’s main line well manned and on the alert. The demonstration developed no apparent change in the force in our front either of artillery or infantry.
In accordance with instructions to carry out the original orders to assault at 4 a.m. on April 2 the captured line was abandoned. By 1 a.m. the firing had all quieted down, and the concentration of troops for the attack was well under way. To the right of the Jerusalem plank road running through Fort Sedgwick, Hartranft’s division was massed in rear of the fort-Willcox’s First Brigade, his left one, Colonel Samuel Harriman commanding, was massed on Hartranft’s right. The Fifty-first Pennsylvania Volunteers being left in the works to hold the brigade line, Colonel Harriman was ordered to report to General Hartranft. Potter’s (Second) division was massed on Hartranft’s left, to the left of the plank road. At 3 a.m. I established my headquarters at Fort Rice, and at the same time Generals Potter and Hartranft formed the assaulting column between our main line and picket-line without alarming the enemy, whose picket-line was in close proximity. The assaulting force was in column of regiments in the following order: On the right of the Jerusalem plank road with left resting on the road, the Third Division, the advance regiments being the Two hundred and seventh Pennsylvania Volunteers, Colonel Cox commanding; followed by the Two hundred and fifth Pennsylvania Volunteers, Major Morrow commanding; the Two hundred and eleventh Pennsylvania, Colonel Dodd commanding, and the Two hundred and eighth Pennsylvania, Lieutenant-Colonel Heintzelman commanding; the two remaining regiments of the division, the Two hundred and Two hundred and ninth Pennsylvania, were held as reserve behind the works. On the right of this column was Harriman’s brigade of the First Division in the following order: Thirty-eighth Wisconsin, Colonel Bintliff commanding; One hundred and ninth New York, Lieutenant-Colonel Pier commanding, and the Eighth Michigan Volunteers, Major Doyle commanding. The remaining regiments of the brigade, the Twenty-seventh Michigan and Thirty-seventh Wisconsin, remained in reserve in rear of the right with Hartranft’s division, Potter’s division, was formed, Griffin’s brigade in the advance, supported by Curtin’s brigade. Six regiments from the division were left to garrison the forts on its line. Storming parties, accompanied by pioneers provided with axes to clear away the abatis and chevaux-de-frise, preceded each column. Details of artillery-men to work any guns that might be captured were also in readiness.
With the view of leading the enemy astray as to the real point of attack I directed General Willcox to make a strong demonstration on his front at 4 a.m. I judged this demonstration would most certainly deceive the enemy from the fact learned from deserters, that our main assault was expected on the Fort Stedman front.”
After an initial artillery bombardment at 4 am, Willcox carried out the diversion near the Appomattox. His feint captured some of the Rebel skirmish line near the crater, and even managed to take about 250 yards of their main line nearer the Appomattox River. They were soon driven out, however, due to lack of numbers. Perhaps, given the results, Parke might have been better served by staging his assault right along the Appomattox. On the other hand, Parke had heard the Confederates were expecting an attack near Fort Stedman due to the proximity of the opposing lines, hence the decision to make an attack in a completely different front.
The main assault on Fort Mahone and other fortifications along Jerusalem Plank Road, led by picked men with axes to clear the abatis at 4 am, jumped off at 4:30 am from in front of Fort Sedgwick. Captain Thomas P. Beals, who led a portion of those picked men, remembered the charge:
“At last the signal came along: ‘Four o’clock and all is well.’ First making sure that my party were all on the alert and ready, we moved ahead at a quick step over ground that was fairly good at daylight, but in the dusk of morning it seemed rough and uneven. Nothing could be distinguished beyond a few paces in front.
We reached our picket lines and could then tell about how far we were from those of the enemy. All was quiet in that direction. We hoped to surprise their pickets, capture what were in our way, and then rush right ahead to their main works. So we marched on, uncertain whether we were moving faster or slower than the division that was supposed to be moving on our right beyond the [Jerusalem] Plank Road. This did not matter however, as my orders were not made dependent on the connections. At length the intrenched line of the enemy’s pickets became visible not many yards in our front, when without a stop we made for it at the double-quick. The rebel pickets opened fire just as we were going over their pits. My orderly sergeant, S. L. Kimball, by my side, was shot through the body at that time. I supposed at the time that he was killed, but, a few days after, learned that he crawled back to the rear. He did not recover however. The rebel pickets probably were glad to move to the rear; at any rate we saw no more of them. We made no stop here, and, pushing ahead, soon came to the Jerusalem [Plank] Road, along which our orders were to advance upon their main line.
And now, flushed with the easy victory at the picket line, we took up a quicker movement, a double-quick, and at once our charging yell startled the slumbering shadows of the morning. Then from their forts and batteries they opened fire, and grape and canister crashed into us and over us as we charged on to “Fort Damnation.”
The enemy’s fire grew hotter. The bullets began to come and my men were falling. Yet we pressed on, realizing that the nearer we approached the more likely were the shots of the enemy to pass over our heads. Reaching the outer margin of the cheveaux-de-frise that fringed the approach to their works, I halted my party to straighten them out and take breath before the final assault. It was now so light that concealment was mostly gone. We had supposed that the main column of attack was moving up behind us at the proper interval and now expected to see it ready for the grapple: but where was it? — nowhere within sight or sound. I had the men lie down close to the ground under the enemy’s guns and, as the light came, began to shoot into the embrasures where they were working their guns. This produced a good effect in distracting somewhat the fire of the enemy and diverting the attention of my own men from their exposed condition. In this situation some unpleasant thoughts began to obtrude themselves, and one of three things could be the only solution of the mystery. The main column had either gone in another direction from our own, or it had not started when the signal was given, or it had started and, when the enemy opened fire, had retreated. I must confess that I have always entertained the last of these conditions as the true one, and was about to state that as what actually occurred. But it is not my province or even my right to state what I did not see, unless it can be substantiated by some official record or other reliable evidence, and my impression was probably wrong. It is more likely that some delay occurred in the start and that the main column did not move up so rapidly as the storming party. The consequence would be the delay now so seriously felt both by the advanced party and by the main column itself in the form of the shelling that was rained down from all the guns of the enemy, direct and cross fire, covering the entire field.
In front of us loomed up the formidable fort, belching forth its murderous iron, the very object of our attack. It seemed as if an hour had passed when our ears caught the Union war cry, and we knew that the charge was on. As they appeared in the distance, the storming party and the pioneers crawled up still nearer, rushed forward to the obstruction and cut it away; separated the logs, into which the sharpened stakes were driven and connected by wire; and by pulling out one end of the logs we turned the sharpened points the other way, soon opening a space broad enough for the column front to enter, and then we pushed on for the fort. But here we found another difficulty. A trench had been cut outside the fort many feet deep. The recent rains had partly filled this trench with water. Some of the men fell in as they rushed ahead to climb the high, slanting ascent and were unable to get out and were drowned. All was excitement now. Finding the direct approach impossible, we circled around to the left, and this time, after a sharp struggle in which the troops of the main column participated with us, all in a bunch, we forced our way inside their works. Many prisoners were taken, but many of the garrison ran back behind their inner lines. The cannon were ours and were immediately turned and worked by infantry until a detachment of artillery men was sent up from Fort Sedgwick to handle them. The captured fort being open in the rear we at once became the object of a fierce fire from their inner lines and forts and traverses running back from their outer lines of works. The regiments, after entering the fort, took up the gage of battle and drove the enemy to the left. It was a series of charges and the organizations became intermingled, although fighting with a will.
In relating the occurrences of the charge it was my intention to confine myself to personal observation and I will refrain from quoting the official records, having landed the brigade inside those works that had for more than nine months defiantly flaunted the Confederate colors in our faces.”
Parke’s men took Fort Mahone and three other forts in the vicinity, but they were unable to achieve a full breakthrough. The defending Confederates of Gordon’s Second Corps, Army of Northern Virginia, quickly regrouped in the rear and organized for counterattacks. To make matters worse for Parke, veteran Second Division commander Robert Potter was wounded in the initial assault, with the prevailing thought indicating a mortal wounding. Potter was carried to the rear, and Brigadier General S. G. Griffin took over. Parke reported the capture of the first line of Confederate works, but relayed to Grant and Meade that he was unable to break the Confederate lines fully. Grant debated, and after considering the matter, asked Parke via Meade to simply hold his front from 7:40 am on. To borrow an earlier phrase of Grant’s, Parke would hold a leg now while others did the skinning.
The Sixth Corps Breakthrough
That skinning was occurring further to the southwest, on the front of Wright’s Sixth Corps. As promised, his men “ma[d]e the fur fly” when they got their chance to hit the Confederate lines simultaneously with the Ninth Corps attack.
From the beginning, Horatio Wright was more certain of success than John Parke. His men had taken the Confederate picket lines in his front on March 25, 1865, after the Confederates’ disastrous attack on Fort Stedman. This March 25 picket line fighting had given Wright a perfect jumping off point for the attack he eventually launched on the morning of April 2, 1865. Wright, taking no chances, massed all of his Sixth Corps, three divisions, in front of Forts Fisher and Welch. His attack would be a strong, narrow and concentrated one, shaped like an arrowhead and meant to quickly punch an irreparable hole in the Confederate lines from which they couldn’t recover.
After Meade sent him attack orders on the afternoon of April 1, Wright wrote up his plan of attack and sent it to his division commanders (OR XLVI, P3, pp. 423-424):
“In accordance with instructions received from Major-General Meade, an attack will be made at 4 a. m. to-morrow upon that part of the enemy’s line between the house burnt by us on Saturday (the Jones house) and our left. The First Division will take the right, the Second Division the center, and the Third Division on the left; the Second Division being in advance, the First and Third on the right and left being in echelon, the entire formation being by brigade, with regimental front, small regiments being consolidated so as not too much to extend the column, and the Third Division being well advanced, though still in echelon. The divisions, being moved to as near the picket-line as practicable, will advance promptly at 4 a. m. on the firing of a gun from Fort Fisher.
The entire picket-line will be advanced at the same time, and that part of it on the right of the attacking columns will gain any point in the enemy’s works that it may be practicable for it to carry, the parts of the line which it may be impossible to advance keeping up a heavy fire upon the enemy.
The garrisons of the works from Fort Howard to Fort Urmston, reduced to the minimum, will be maintained, as will also those of Forts Gregg, Sampson, and Cummings, and also the one-tenth of the force in the rifle pits connecting the works named, the line between Forts Urmston and Gregg being abandoned.
The five batteries already designated to move with the corps will accompany the attack, one being assigned to each division, and the other two being held in reserve while the remainder of the batteries now present will remain in the works to the right of Fort Fisher and to the left of Fort Gregg, as may be directed by the chief of artillery, under special instructions.
The troops in the forts on the rear line, to the left of Fort Cummings, will be returned to their commands to-night in time to take part in the attack.
Pioneers should be distributed along the front of the assaulting columns to clear away abatis and other obstructions, and the division sharpshooters will be so disposed as to be rendered most effective.
The garrisons left behind will be held ready to repulse any counter attack of the enemy, and the infantry promptly to join their commands, and the artillery to go to the rear upon receiving orders to that effect.
In forming the column for attack it is recommended that the First Division be formed left in front, and the Third Division right in front, so as to form readily to the right and left, respectively, if necessary.
The troops should start from their camps to-night and proceed to the vicinity of Forts Fisher and Welch in time to move to the positions assigned them near the picket line and complete their formation before 4 a. m.
The quartermaster, commissary, and medical departments will be in readiness to conform to the movements above referred to.
The necessity of perfect silence in this movement, up to the time of making the assault, cannot be too strongly impressed upon the command.
Should we succeed in breaking the enemy’s line and gaining the Boydton plank road the subsequent movements of the corps will be in conformity with the orders of Major General Meade already promulgated.”
After Wright’s orders were issued, he too faced some uncertainty that evening as Grant worried over Sheridan’s potential vulnerability and asked Meade to have Wright and Parke attack immediately. Wright argued against this, worried the Confederates would be tipped off and better able to respond to his planned sledgehammer blow. Eventually, after Meade explained the situation to Grant, Wright got his way, with orders issued by Meade at 1:30 am for both Wright and Parke to attack at 4 as originally planned.
Wright spent the remainder of the night of April 1-2, 1865 getting his divisions into position to attack. By 4 am, his men were ready, but they waited 40 more minutes in the pre-dawn darkness for enough light to see where they were going prior to attacking. I’ll let Wright describe his carefully planned assault:
“The assaulting columns were in position before 4 a. m.; but the unusual darkeners at that hour rendered any connected movement impracticable, and the columns did not therefore move till 4.40 a. m., when it had become light enough for the men to see to step, though nothing was discernible beyond a few yards distance. Axmen had been distributed along the front of the assaulting columns, and the sharpshooters of the divisions had been so disposed as to produce their greatest effect. The point chosen for assault, selected after the most careful considerations, based upon personal examination and the reports of a large number of officers who had for a long time scanned the works of the enemy, was in front of Forts Fisher and Welch, over ground perfectly cleared of trees and offering few natural obstructions, except the marshes with which the front of the enemy’s line was intersected… By some mischance or misapprehension our pickets in the vicinity of the forming columns commenced firing while the columns were forming, and brought, not only upon themselves but on the dense masses in their rear, a return fire which, for a movement, threatened to seriously interfere with if not break up the plan of attack. Everything was soon quieted down, however, by the exertions of the officers, though many casualties occurred from this contretemps. The men behaved well during the whole of the severe fire, without returning a shot or uttering a word to indicate their presence to the enemy. All being ready, the hour named for the assault having passed and light enough having dawned, the columns moved promptly at the signal, at 4.40 a. m., broke over the enemy’s picket line, meeting little resistance, and poured their masses over the main defenses, under a heavy fire of artillery and a more deadly though less noisy fire of musketry from the parapets. Abatis was cut away, and through the openings thus made, and through those made by the enemy for his convenience of access to the front, his works were gained. Here occurred a brief but sharp conflict, which soon resulted in giving us possession of the whole front of attack. In the ardor of the movement it was quite impossible to check the advance of the troops at once, and parties from each division soon reached the Boydton plank road and the South Side Railroad, breaking up the latter somewhat and cutting the telegraph wire of the enemy.”
Wright had broken through Lane’s North Carolinians. The object for which Grant and his army group had been striving for 9 ½ months was finally within reach. With this breakthrough, Lee could no longer hold Petersburg. If Petersburg fell, Richmond would fall as well.
Wright had a choice to make as his men broke through the Confederate lines southwest of Petersburg. Should he turn right, toward Petersburg, or left, toward Burgess Mill? He chose the latter, and drove a good portion of Heth’s and Wilcox’s Third Corps divisions to the southwest, away from the rest of Lee’s army.
Eventually, Wright was reinforced by portions of Ord’s Army of the James, reversed front, and approached Petersburg from the southwest. But more on that below.
Confederate Reaction
Shortly after the breakthrough, as Federal skirmishers probed into the rear of the Confederate Boydton Plank Road line, Confederate Third Corps commander A. P. Hill tried to ride past the damage and rejoin the majority of his corps. He never made it. Two Federal skirmishers had a short firefight with Hill and his aide, with Hill falling dead from the saddle. Another well-known Confederate general had fallen in this chaotic last week of fighting at Petersburg.
As Parke’s Ninth Corps gained a foothold in the Confederate works and Wright’s Sixth Corps broke clean through southwest of Petersburg on the Boydton Plank Road line, Robert E. Lee knew he was in serious trouble. His army was now scattered into five distinct parts, Longstreet and Ewell north of the James, Mahone on the Bermuda Hundred front, Gordon east and southeast of Petersburg with portions of Hill’s Third Corps which had been cut off during the Breakthrough, the remnants of Third Corps and Fourth Corps west of the Breakthrough, and Pickett’s force which had crossed the Appomatox after the disaster at Five Forks. It was all Lee could do to keep his army from disintegrating. During the night of April 1-2, Lee had asked Longstreet to move Field’s Division from north of the James to Petersburg. Worried that Field wouldn’t make it in time, Lee also had Mahone detach Nathaniel Harris’ Mississippi Brigade from his Bermuda Hundred defenses. Before April 2 was out, all of these men would be needed to stave off disaster, and it was a close run thing.
Follow-Up on Other Fronts (Sheridan, Ord, Second Corps, Weitzel)
The other corps and army commanders along the Union lines were more or less prepared to go to the support of Parke and Wright if they made any progress. The idea was to put pressure on Lee’s entire front south of the Appomattox so that he couldn’t concentrate his Confederate forces against any piece of the whole. In hindsight though, Grant had nothing to worry about. His repeated blows of the past week had left Lee desperately trying to react with less and less chance of success.
North of the James River, farthest away from the action, Godfrey Weitzel was tasked with watching Longstreet’s forces and attacking if he saw a significant weakening of the Confederate lines. As April 2 wore on, Grant repeatedly urged Weitzel to attack. He wanted Weitzel to prevent reinforcements from heading south to Petersburg. Weitzel, however, was not a man of action today, citing his 8,000 available troops as too weak a force to do any real damage. He did have Hartsuff skirmish with the enemy on Bermuda Hundred, and he managed to capture the Confederate picket line, but Weitzel didn’t press this advantage and heavy artillery fire drove Hartsuff back. No attempt to take Richmond by a coup de main north of the James would occur this day. To make matters worse, those reinforcements Grant feared poured across the Appomattox into Petersburg.
Andrew Humphreys’ Second Corps, Army of the Potomac, began the day divided. After some back and forth on the night of April 1-2, Grant and Meade finally directed Humphreys to send Miles’ Division west down White Oak Road to help Sheridan. This left Humphrreys with only two of his divisions, and he felt too weak to make an attack on the Confederate White Oak Road line. Meade and Grant relented, and Humphreys was instructed to keep an eye open for opportunities.
Sheridan, his cavalry, and the Fifth Corps, now under the command of Charles Griffin, were expected to do great things on April 2. Meade expected Sheridan to move via the Cox and River roads near the Appomattox, bagging any Confederates moving west on the south side of the Appomattox. Moving east up the South Side Railroad would have had similar results. For reasons I still don’t fully understand, however, Sheridan chose to move east on White Oak Road, essentially forcing Miles to retrace the route he had just taken the night before. This move caused serious confusion, as Humphreys and Sheridan tried to figure out who was in charge of Miles. Ultimately, neither took charge, and Miles was on his own. You’ll read more about Miles’ exploits this day at the Battle of Sutherland’s Station.
After Wright’s breakthrough, Humphreys soon found the Confederates in the White Oak Road line in his front retiring north of Hatcher’s Run. Sheridan approached from the west and also hurried these Confederate forces along. But there would be no major battle in this sector of the field. The White Oak Road line had fallen without a fight, and the noose around Petersburg was tightened even further. Humphreys soon received word to move with two of his divisions, minus Miles to Wright’s aid as the Sixth Corps and Army of the James moved northeast to attack Petersburg proper. Ultimately, Humphreys and his two divisions didn’t arrive in time to help Wright, and they would have proven useful in Miles’ fight at Sutherland’s Station.
Sheridan did next to nothing on April 2, a fact often overshadowed by his (really Warren’s) victory at Five Forks the previous day. He used his cavalry and Fifth Corps, a sizable force which could have added to what became a great victory, to instead passively occupy the White Oak Road line after it had been evacuated by the Confederates. If anyone reading this can point me to sources which look at Sheridan’s actions on April 2, 1865, please use the Contact link at the top of the page. In any event, Sheridan could have bagged many Confederates had he done what Meade expected him to do, advancing east much nearer the Appomattox River. His poor performance here was overlooked given the end result here and his subsequent performance in the Appomattox Campaign.
The Battle of Fort Gregg
As some of you may recall, Army of the James commander Edward Ord had taken portions of Gibbon’s Twenty-Fourth Corps, Weitzel’s Twenty-Fifth Corps, and Mackenzie’s cavalry division southwest to Hatcher’s Run just prior to the Ninth Offensive kicking off in late march. On April 2, his instructions were similar to those of Humphreys. As Parke and Wright attack to your right, keep an eye open for opportunities to advance. Ord soon found just such an opportunity. Henry Heth, in charge of the Confederate forces west of the breakthrough, decided to pull his forces on the Boydton Plank Road and White Oak Road lines north to the South Side railroad, to come together in the vicinity of Sutherland’s Station. This pullback meant the Confederate lines in Ord’s front were soon being evacuated. Ord moved forward and soon linked up with Wright’s Sixth Corps, which had headed left, or southwest, down the Confederate lines. By 10 am, Wright and Ord reversed course, moving northeast in an effort to get into Petersburg.
Meanwhile, Lee was desperately trying to hold on to the Dimmock Line surrounding Petersburg, which touched the Appomattox to the east and west of the Cockade City. Part of Lane’s Brigade and Wilcox’s division had fallen back toward Petersburg to the northeast, cut off from the rest of Hill’s Third Corps by the breakthrough. Nathaniel Harris’ Mississippi Brigade of Mahone’s Division, fresh from Bermuda Hundred, arrived at the right place and time. Robert E. Lee needed to buy some time in order to fill out the western portions of the Dimmock Line with Charles Field’s Division, but they hadn’t yet arrived. Harris’ men were sent to two earthworks to the west of the Dimmock Line proper, Forts Gregg and Whitworth, with orders to hold off Wright and Ord long enough for Lee to fill the Dimmock Line.
Harris’ defense of Fort Gregg was legendary, and is often referred to as a “Confederate Alamo.” It was so legendary, in fact, that Confederates from various forces argued over who had defended it in the decades following the Civil War. This is remarkable when compared to how little remembered the battle is today. Harris had around 350 men in Fort Gregg and 200 in Fort Whitworth. Foster’s and Turner’s divisions of Ord’s Army of the James led the attack on these two forts, with the main attack focused on Fort Gregg.
Brigadier General Robert S. Foster, whose division of the Twenty-Fourth Corps led the attack on Fort Gregg, remembered the desperate nature of the struggle:
“At about 8 a.m. on the 2nd, pursuant to orders, I moved to the right through the enemy’s works, which had been penetrated by the Sixth Army Corps, relieving General Hamblin’s brigade of that corps, which moved to the left toward Hatcher’s Run, I moving with my command in line of battle-the First Brigade, Colonel Osborn, on the right; the Third, Colonel Dandy, in the center; and the Fourth, Colonel Fairchild, en echelon on the left-inside the captured works in the direction of Petersburg, driving the enemy before me from several lines of works until we arrived at the strong double lines of forts around that city, into which works the enemy retired, Forts Gregg and Baldwin being on my immediate front. At about 1 p.m., pursuant to orders, I directed an assault upon Fort Gregg, which was gallantly made, and resulted in the capture of the work, with two guns and the entire garrison of 250 officers and men. The fighting on both sides at this point was the most desperate I ever witnessed, being a hand to hand struggle for twenty-five minutes after my troops had reached the parapet. Fifty-seven of the enemy’s dead were found inside the work. Several regiments of the command claim the honor of first planting their colors on the work; but where all did so well and the difference is so slight I find it impossible to decide who is entitled to it. A portion of General Turner’s division came up during the assault and rendered efficient service. Brevet Brigadier-General Harris’ brigade, of General Turner’s division, was ordered to report to me just previous to the assault, and was formed on my left and advanced to the deserted camp in front of Fort Baldwin. Had there not been a wide gap between the left of Harris’ brigade and the Sixth Army Corps, which would have exposed my left flank, the garrison of Fort Baldwin could have been captured. This fort was evacuated by the enemy as soon as Gregg was surrendered, and was occupied by the Eleventh Maine, of the Third Brigade, followed by portions of the Fourth Brigade and Harris’ brigade. Immediately on the surrender of Fort Gregg, Captain Charles Sellmer, acting assistant inspector-general of my staff, entered the work and turned its guns on the retreating forces from Fort Baldwin.”
Though two of Harris’ Mississippi regiments and some Confederate artillery had fought desperately at Fort Gregg, Union numbers eventually told, and the forts surrendered. The Union forces lost more men in these attacks, over 700 in all, than the total Confederates who had defended the two forts. Harris had done his job, however. By the time the forts fell, Field’s men were securely positioned in the right flank works of the Dimmock line, and Lee had enough time to safely evacuate Petersburg that evening rather than losing thousands as prisoners during the afternoon and evening.
The Battle of Sutherland’s Station
One other action on April 2 occurred far west of the other three combats, at Sutherland’s Station on the Southside Railroad. Henry Heth had ordered the remnants of his command to organize there to escape being flanked by the Union Sixth Corps after it had broken through the Boydton Plank Road line. Confusion between Sheridan and Humphreys over who had control of Miles’ Division of the Second Corps led to neither supporting him. Miles was undeterred by this lack of support and aggressively pursued Heth’s Confederates, moving north on Claiborne Road and eventually confronting the Confederates at Sutherland’s Station in late morning. Heth had left, moving east to take over Third Corps near Petesburg proper after the death of A. P. Hill. This left Brigadier General John Cooke in command of the four Confederate brigades facing Miles.
Miles hit Cooke three times during the morning and afternoon, choosing not to wait for Humphreys’ remaining two divisions to come up from the east in support. Humphreys had essentially been sent on a wild goose chase by Meade and Grant on April 2, not helping Miles at Sutherland’s Station or Ord at Forts Gregg and Whitworth. Despite this, Miles was ultimately successful, his persistence paying off handsomely.
In his official report, Miles recalled what had happened in his chance at independent command:
“At 9 a. m. the enemy abandoned his works, and they were immediately occupied by my men. The pursuit of the enemy was at once commenced, and he was followed closely to a point near Sutherland’s Station, where he was found in position behind breast-works with artillery. The Second and Third Brigades were immediately ordered to charge the position, and they advanced promptly to the attack, by owing to the natural strength of the position and the difficult nature of the ground intervening the assault was unsuccessful. It was in this attack that Brevet Brigadier-General Madill, commanding Third Brigade, was wounded severely, while gallantly urging his men forward to the enemy’s works. At 12.30 p. m. a second assault was made by the Third Brigade, Brevet Brigadier-General MacDougall having been placed in command. The artillery of the division had at this time come up, and being placed in position assisted in the attack by a vigorous shelling of the enemy’s line. This attack was also repulsed, the enemy being able to concentrate his force opposite any threatened point. The brigade was withdrawn to its former position-a crest about 800 yards from that occupied by the enemy. I now determined to carry the position by an attack on the enemy’s flank. A strong skirmish line was pushed forward upon the extreme right flank of the enemy, overlapping it and threatening the railroad. Indeed, a portion of this skirmish line was on the railroad at 1.10 o’clock. The attention of the enemy being thus diverted from his left flank, the Fourth Brigade (Brevet Brigadier-General Ramsey) was moved rapidly around it through a ravine and wood, and massed in the woods without being discovered by the enemy. At 2.45 p. m. the brigade advanced at double quick, with a hearty cheer and in magnificent order, striking the enemy in flank, and sweeping rapidly down inside the breast-works, capturing a large number of prisoners and putting to precipitous flight the remainder. That portion of the enemy who escaped were driven to the woods near the river, where they were picked up the next morning. Captain Clark’s battery (B), First New Jersey Artillery, rendered great assistance in this attack by keeping up a vigorous and well-directed fire upon the enemy. The division captured 600 prisoners, 1 battle-flag, and 2 pieces of artillery. As I was directed by General Sheridan to drive the enemy toward Petersburg, I advanced in that direction by the River and the South Side roads about two miles, when I was met by the Second Division, who were moving on the latter road in the opposite direction. I therefore returned to the vicinity of Sutherland’s Station toward evening, disposed my troops so as to hold the railroad, and bivouacked for the night.”
In the October 22, 1873 edition of Our Living and Our Dead, a New Berne, North Carolina newspaper, Captain James A. Graham of the 27th North Carolina, Cooke’s Brigade, remembered Sutherland’s Station from the Confederate perspective:
“Just before midnight we were relieved by Davis’ Mississippi brigade and crossing the creek, took position in fort Euliss[?]. Here the enemy were on three sides of us—our only protected side being that from which we had just moved—and as soon as day opened [April 2, 1865] they began to fire upon us with both infantry and artillery. Our breastworks were prepared in such a way as, to some extent, to meet these flank fires; but they did not always suit as some of our men were killed that morning by shots which, striking a limb above them, glanced directly downward inflicting death wounds. We could distinctly hear the shouts of the troops, fighting between us and Petersburg, and our feelings would rise or fall in proportion, as we could hear the Confederate “yell” or the yankee “huzza” in the ascendancy. After a while the “huzza” seemed to prevail and soon a courier came dashing into our fort. Very shortly afterwards we were ordered out of our works and in a few minutes were on the retreat from Petersburg.
After moving some four or five miles we threw out first one regiment and then another as skirmishers to retard the enemy, who were pressing us hard, and on arriving at Sutherland Tavern, a station on the Southside [Rail] Road about 10 miles from Petersburg, we formed line of battle and threw up breastworks of the rails and other stuff which we could find near at hand, adding such dirt as we could dig up with our bayonets, tin cups, plates, &c. Soon the enemy charged us, but were repulsed with heavy loss and, as they started back, our sharpshooters rushing forward captured many prisoners. These prisoners told us that the next charge would be made by the negro corps, supported by the second and they would show no quarter. We told them that having whipped the whites we could whip the negroes. The fighting was heavy till about 4 o’clock, p. m., when the enemy largely outnumbering us, turned our left flank and we were compelled to retreat. Falling back about four or five miles the 13th [North Carolina], 22[n]d [North Carolina], 27th [North Carolina], and 49th N[orth]. C[arolina]. regiments were thrown out to keep the enemy in check, while the balance of our troops—Cooke’s, Scales’ and McRae’s N[orth]. C[arolina]. brigades, and McGowan’s S[outh]. C[arolina]. brigade, the troops on the right of the break in our lines, forming the corps—endeavored to cross the river so as to join the main army from which we had been cut off by the break. Finding that we could not cross, these regiments were recalled and we pursued our way up the river, until 2 o’clock that night [early morning of April 3, 1865] when we halted for rest.”
Had Miles been supported and had Sheridan done his job, this entire force might have been captured by Union forces that afternoon. As it was, Miles still achieved a victory, contributing positively to the Union cause on April 2, 1865.
Conclusion and Results
April 2, 1865, 150 years ago today, was the last day of the Siege of Petersburg. The various fights which together made up the Third Battle of Petersburg had shattered Lee’s lines and made the evacuation of Richmond and Petersburg a must. At the cost of 3,300 casualties, Grant’s armies had placed more than 6,500 of Lee’s men hors du combat, mostly as prisoners. Lee departed both cities overnight, Grant took up the pursuit, and the Appomattox Campaign began on April 3, 1865. Nine and a half months of struggle had finally ended with a massive, and most would say inevitable, Union victory.
Unlike some of his predecessors, Grant had never taken his eyes off the prize. He was not distracted when Lee sent forces elsewhere, first Early’s Second Corps, and later infantry and cavalry reinforcements to Early. Instead, he kept Lee in a death grip at Petersburg with most of his force, sending Sheridan, two of his cavalry divisions, the Sixth Corps, and Nineteenth Corps (the latter fresh from the Army of the Gulf) to keep Early away from Washington, D. C., and ultimately to drive him out of the Shenandoah Valley as well.
The Northern forces had come very, very close to taking Petersburg several times before, with the best chances on June 15-16, July 30, and September 29, 1864, but Lee’s men had always risen to the occasion and beat back the invaders. By March-April 1865 however, Lee had a serious desertion problem which was rapidly stripping him of desperately needed men. After leaving the trenches of Petersburg and Richmond, Lee would surrender only a week later, on April 9, 1865 at Appomattox Court House.
Thank You and What’s to Come
I’d like to thank those of you who spent the sesquicentennial of the Siege of Petersburg following my sometimes rambling and often hurried posts here at The Siege of Petersburg Online. After posting real time for nine and a half months, my engines need a bit of a break to regroup. That said, I’ve got some content planned during my brief sabbatical. Starting after Lee’s surrender, you’ll see the Ed Bearss Petersburg Battlefield troop movement maps start to appear here, one a day, for the better portions of April, May, and June 2015. After that, the future is wide open. I’ve got tons of newspaper articles transcribed by Jackie Martin and others just waiting to be published. In addition, I hope to start looking through and studying various regimental histories, posting excerpts and adding key information to my hundreds of unit pages on the site. Keep an eye out for this content and much more in the years to come. I’ve only scratched the surface of this, the longest and bloodiest campaign of the entire Civil War. I hope you’ll join me as I dig deeper and continue to study this fascinating conflict between Lee and Grant, the two most famous generals of the entire Civil War.
Bibliography:
First Person Accounts:
Siege of Petersburg Documents Which Mention This Battle:
- 150 Years Ago Today at Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- 150 Years Ago Today at Petersburg: October 27, 1864
- 150 Years Ago Today: The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- Bearss 9th Corps Final Assaults Troop Movement Maps
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 1
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 2
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 3
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 4
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 5
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 TOPO
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 1
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 2
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 3
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 4
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 TOPO
- Book Review: Burnside’s Boys: The Union’s Ninth Corps and the Civil War in the East by Darin Wipperman
- Book Review: Remember me to all the friends: Civil War Letters from George W. Harwood Massachusetts 36th Regiment edited by Janet M. Drake
- Book Review: Such Hard and Severe Service: The 85th Pennsylvania in the Civil War, Volume II, 1864-1865 by Dan Clendaniel
- Book Review: The 11th North Carolina Infantry in the Civil War: A History and Roster by William T. Venner
- BTC Notes: History of the One Hundred and Fifth Regiment of Pennsylvania Volunteers
- CLARK NC: 11th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 13th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 18th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 22nd North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 27th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 28th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 37th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 38th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 44th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 46th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: Charlotte North Carolina Artillery at the Siege of Petersburg
- Fort Mahone Diorama: April 2, 1865
- LT: April 2, 1865 Theodore Lyman
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 3 p.m. to 4 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 4 a.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 4:30 a.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 5 a.m. to 1 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 5 a.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, Dusk, April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Sutherland Station, 12 p.m. to 3 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Sutherland Station, 3 p.m. to Dusk, April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Sutherland Station, 7 a.m. to 12 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MOLLUS ME V2: In a Charge Near Fort Hell, Petersburg, April 2, 1865 by Thomas P. Beals
- MOLLUS WI V1: Assault on the Lines of Petersburg, April 2, 1865 by Charles H. Anson
- NP: April 14, 1865 The Bedford Inquirer: 138th PA at the Breakthrough, April 2, 1865
- NP: April 14, 1865 Vermont Watchman: 3rd Vermont Battery at the Breakthrough, April 2, 1865
- NP: April 2, 1965 Petersburg Progress-Index: Siege Centennial, Part 40: The Evacuation Of Petersburg
- NP: April 3, 1865 Richmond Examiner: The War News, March 31-April 2, 1865: Richmond is Doomed
- NP: December 6, 1896 Birmingham Age-Herald: The 10th Alabama at the Siege of Petersburg
- NP: July 24, 1910 Richmond Times-Dispatch: Crater Anecdotes
- NP: May 19, 1865 The Bedford Inquirer: Corporal Mauk of the 138th PA Kills Gen. A. P. Hill, April 2, 1865
- NP: May 5, 1865 The Bedford Inquirer: The 81st PA Gains a New Chaplain, April 3, 1865
- NP: October 1, 1884 The Clarion (Jackson, MS): The Death Grapple at Petersburg: Last Days of Harris’ Mississippi Brigade, Part 4
- NP: October 8, 1884 The Clarion (Jackson, MS): The Surrender-Homeward Bound!: Last Days of Harris’ Mississippi Brigade, Part 5
- NP: September 24, 1884 The Clarion (Jackson, MS): The Death Grapple at Petersburg: Last Days of Harris’ Mississippi Brigade, Part 3
- OR LI P1: Report of Colonel Richard N. Batchelder, Chief Quartermaster, AotP, June 30, 1864 – June 30, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #105: Reports of Major General Horatio G. Wright, commanding VI/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #106: Reports of Bvt. Major General Frank Wheaton, commanding 1/VI/AotP, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #107: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General William H. Penrose, 15th NJ, commanding 1/1/VI/AotP, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #108: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Baldwin Hufty, 4th NJ, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #109: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General Joseph E. Hamblin, 65th NY, commanding 2/1/VI/AotP, April 1-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #110: Reports of Lieutenant Colonel Henry C. Fisk, 65th NY, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #111: Report of Bvt. Colonel Egbert Olcott, 121st NY, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #112: Report of Lieutenant Colonel John Harper, 95th PA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #113: Report of Captain James T. Stuart, 49th PA, commanding SS/1/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #114: Report of Colonel Oliver Edwards, 37th MA, commanding 3/1/VI/AotP, April 1-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #115: Reports of Captain Archibald Hopkins, 37th MA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #116: Report of Bvt. Colonel Baynton J. Hickman, 49th PA, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #117: Report of Colonel Isaac C. Bassett, 82nd PA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #118: Report of Major William C. Gray, 119th PA, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #119: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Elisha H. Rhodes, 2nd RI, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #120: Report of Colonel Thomas S. Allen, 5th WI, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #121: Report of Bvt. Major General George W. Getty, commanding 2/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #122: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Charles A. Milliken, 43rd NY, Pickets/2/VI/AotP, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #123: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General James M. Warner, 1st VTHA, commanding 1/2/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #124: Report of Captain B. Frank Hean, 93rd PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #125: Report of Captain Bernhard Gessler, 98th PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #126: Report of Major James McGregor, 139th PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #127: Report of Bvt. Major General Lewis A. Grant, commanding 2/2/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #128: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Ronald A. Kennedy, 5th VT, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #129: Report of Colonel Thomas W. Hyde, 1st ME Vet, commanding 3/2/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #130: Report of Captain Augustus Merrill, Co B, 1st ME (Veteran), April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #131: Reports of Brigadier General Truman Seymour, commanding 3/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #132: Reports of Colonel William S. Truex, 14th NJ, commanding 1/3/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #134: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Jacob J. Janeway, 14th NJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #135: Reports of Colonel Andrew N. McDonald, 106th NY, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #136: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Charles Bogardus, 151st NY, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #137: Report of Captain James Tearney, 87th PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #138: Report of Lieutenant Colonel George B. Damon, 10th VT, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #139: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General J. Warren Keifer, 110th OH, commanding 2/3/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #140: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Joseph C. Hill, 6th MD, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #141: Reports of Lieutenant Colonel James W. Snyder, 9th NYHA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #142: Reports of Bvt. Colonel Otho H. Binkley, 110th OH, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #144: Report of Colonel Benjamin F. Smith, 126th OH, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #145: Reports of Major William G. Williams, 126th OH, commanding 67th PA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #146: Reports of Colonel Matthew R. McClennan, 138th PA, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #147: Report of Bvt. Major Andrew Cowan, 1st Btty NY Lt Arty, commanding Arty/VI/AotP, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #148: Report of Captain Augustin N. Parsons, Btty A 1st NJ Lt Arty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #149: Reports of Bvt. Captain Orsamus R. Van Etten, 1st NY Btty, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #150: Report of Bvt. Major William A. Harn, 3rd NY Btty, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #151: Report of Captain Crawford Allen, Jr., Btty H 1st RI Lt Arty, April 1-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #152: Reports of Lieutenant John R. Brinckle, Btty E 5th US Arty, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #153: Report of Major General John G. Parke, commanding IX/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #154: Report of Bvt. Major General Orlando B. Willcox, commanding 1/IX/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #155: Report of Colonel Samuel Harriman, 37th WI, commanding 1/1/IX/AotP, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #156: Report of Colonel Charles Waite, 27th MI, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #157: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Colwert K. Pier, 38th WI, commanding 109th NY, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #158: Report of Major Robert N. Roberts, 38th WI, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #159: Report of Bvt. Colonel Ralph Ely, 8th MI, commanding 2/1/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #160: Report of Captain Albert A. Day, 20th MI, Mar 29-Apr 5, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #161: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Adolph Becker, 46th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #162: Report of Colonel James Bintliff, 38th WI, commanding 3/1/IX/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 8, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #165: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Joseph M. Clough, 18th NH, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #167: Report of Brigadier General Simon G. Griffin, commanding 2/IX/AotP, Mar 25-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #168: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General John I. Curtin, 45th PA, commanding 1/2/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #169: Report of Brigadier General Simon G. Griffin, commanding 2/2/IX/AotP, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #170: Report of Bvt. Major General John F. Hartranft, commanding 3/IX/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #171: Report of Lieutenant Colonel William H. H. McCall, 200th PA, commanding 1/3/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #173: Report of Colonel Joseph A. Mathews, 205th PA, commanding 2/3/IX/AotP, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #174: Report of Colonel Robert C. Cox, 207th PA, commanding 2/3/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #175: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General John C. Tidball, 4th NYHA, commanding Arty/IX/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #176: Report of Captain Adelbert B. Twitchell, 7th ME Btty, Mar 30-Apr 12, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #177: Report of Bvt. Major Charles A. Philips, Btty E MA Lt Arty, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #178: Report of Captain Richard S. Milton, 9th MA Btty, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #17: Report of Lieutenant Charles B. Phillips, U. S. Corps of Engineers, IX/AOTP, March 28-April 4, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #180: Report of Captain Joseph W. B. Wright, 14th MA Btty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #181: Report of Bvt. Major Christian Woerner, 3rd NJ Btty, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #182: Report of Captain David F. Ritchie, Btty C 1st NY Lt Arty, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #183: Report of Captain Angell Matthewson, Btty E 1st Ny Lt Arty, Mar 29-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #184: Report of Lieutenant George H. Barse, Btty E 1st NY Lt Arty, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #185: Report of Captain Samuel A. McClellan, Btty G 1st NY Lt Arty, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #186: Report of Bvt. Major George Breck, Btty L 1st NY Lt Arty, Mar 29-Apr 6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #187: Report of Captain Edward W. Rogers, 19th NY Btty, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #188: Report of Captain John. B. Eaton, 27th NY Btty, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #189: Report of Bvt. Major Jacob Roemer, 34th NY Btty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #190: Report of Captain William McClelland, Btty B 1st PA Lt Arty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #191: Report of Captain Samuel H. Rhoads, Btty D PA Lt Arty, Mar 30-Apr 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #192: Report of Lieutenant Valentine H. Stone, Batteries C and I 5th US Arty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #193: Report of Bvt. Brig. Gen. Charles H. T. Collis, 114th PA, commanding IndBrig/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #194: Report of Colonel Charles F. Walcott, 61st MA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #195: Report of Colonel Jacob B. Hardenbergh, 80th NY (20th Militia), April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #196: Report of Colonel Andrew H. Tippin, 68th PA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #197: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Robert E. Winslow, 68th PA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #198: Report of Captain John R. Waterhouse, 114th PA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #19: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General Henry L. Abbot, 1st CTHA, commanding Siege Train, March 29-April 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #1: Report of Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant, commanding U.S. Army, March 1864-May, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #20: Report of Lieutenant William H. Rogers, commanding det. 1st CTHA, March 31-April 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #213: Report of Major General Edward O. C. Ord, commanding Army of the James, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #214: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General Peter S. Michie, Chief Engineer, AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #217: Report of Major General George L. Hartsuff, commanding Defenses of Bermuda Hundred, AotJ, Mar 19-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #218: Report of Bvt. Major General Edward Ferrero, Infantry Division, Defenses of Bermuda Hundred, AotJ, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #219: Report of Major General John Gibbon, commanding XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #21: Reports of Major General Andrew A. Humphreys, commanding II/AotP, March 29-April 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #220: Report of Lieutenant Frederick J. Amsden, Signal Corps Det/XXIV/AotJ, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #221: Reports of Brigadier General Robert S. Foster, commanding 1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #222: Report of Colonel Thomas O. Osborn, 39th IL, commanding 1/1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #223: Report of Captain Homer A. Plympton, 39th IL, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #224: Report of Colonel Alvin C. Voris, 67th OH, Apr 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #225: Report of Colonel James C. Briscoe, 199th PA, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #226: Report of Colonel George B. Dandy, 100th NY, commanding 3/1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #227: Report of Captain Francis G. Hickerson, 10th CT, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #228: Report of Captain Henry C. Adams, 11th ME, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #229: Report of Captain Edwin Nichols, 100th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #230: Report of Colonel Harrison S. Fairchild, 89th NY, commanding 4/1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #231: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Edward A. True, 8th ME, Mar 27-Apr 6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #233: Report of Captain William Dobie, 89th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #234: Report of Colonel John B. Murray, 148th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #235: Report of Lieutenant Colonel William H. McNary, 158th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #236: Report of Captain George H. Hill, 55th PA, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #23: Reports of Asst. Surg. Charles Smart, Medical Inspector, II/AotP, Mar 1-Apr 30, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #240: Report of Bvt. Major General John W. Turner, commanding Ind/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #241: Reports of Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Potter, 34th MA, commanding 1/Ind/XXIV/AotJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #242: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Horace Kellogg, 123rd OH, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #243: Reports of Colonel William B. Curtis, 12th WV, commanding 2/Ind/XXIV/AotJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #244: Reports of Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris, commanding 3/Ind/XXIV/AotJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #245: Report of Captain George T. Anthony, 17th NY Btty, Mar 26-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #246: Report of Captain Samuel S. Elder, Btty B 1st US Arty, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #248: Report of Major General Godfrey Weitzel, commanding Detachment/AotJ, Mar 28-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #253: Report of Colonel James Shaw, Jr., 7th USCT, commanding 1/2/XXV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #254: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General Ulysses Doubleday, 45th USCT, commanding 2/2/XXV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #255: Report of Colonel Samuel C. Armstrong, 8th USCT, Mar 28-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #256: Report of Colonel Llewellyn F. Haskell, 41st USCT, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #257: Report of Major Theodore C. Glazier, 45th USCT, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #258: Report of Lieutenant Colonel James Givin, 127th USCT, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #259: Report of Colonel William W. Woodward, 116th USCT, commanding 3/2/XXV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #266: Medals of Honor, Mar 31-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #267: Reports of General Robert E. Lee, commanding Army of Northern Virginia, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #26: Report of Colonel George W. Scott, 61st NY, commanding 1/1/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #270: Report of Brigadier General William N. Pendleton, Chief of Artillery, ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #272: Report of Brigadier General James H. Lane, commanding Lane/Wilcox/Third/ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #273: Report of Major General Bushrod R. Johnson, commanding Johnson/Fourth/ANV, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #28: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Welcome A. Crafts, 5th NH, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #29: Report of Capt. Francis R. Humphreys, 2nd NYHA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #30: Report of Major George W. Schaffer, Sixty-first New York Infantry, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #32: Report of Colonel Robert Nugent, 69th NY, commanding 2/1/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #33: Report of Captain Patrick H. Bird, 28th MA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #34: Report of Captain William H. Terwilliger, 63rd NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #35: Report of Lieutenant Colonel James J. Smith, 69th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #36: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Denis F. Burke, 88th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #37: Report of Major Seward F. Gould, 4th NYHA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #38: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General Clinton D. MacDougall, 111th NY, commanding 3/1/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #39: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Pokorny, 7th NY (Veteran), Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #40: Report of Major John McE. Hyde, 39th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #41: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Henry M. Karples, 52nd NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #42: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Lewis W. Husk, 111th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #43: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Hyde, 125th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #44: Report of Captain I. Hart Wilder, 126th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #45: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General John Ramsey, 8th NJ, commanding 4/1/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #46: Report of Lieutenant Colonel William Glenny, 64th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #47: Report of Captain Nathaniel P. Lane, 66th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #48: Report of Colonel William M. Mintzer, 53rd PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #49: Report of Captain John R. Weltner, 116th PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Itineraries of the Army of the Potomac, Sheridan’s Cavalry Command, and the Army of the James, January-April 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Report of Major General George G. Meade, commanding Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #50: Report of Captain James H. Hamlin, 145th PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #51: Report of Captain John F. Sutton, 148th PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #52: Report of Colonel George T. Egbert, 183rd PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #53: Report of Brigadier General William Hays, commanding 2/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 5, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #55: Report of Colonel William A. Olmsted, 59th NY, commanding 1/2/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #57: Report of Colonel James P. McIvor, 170th NY, commanding 2/2/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #58: Report of Colonel Daniel Woodall, 1st DE, commanding 3/2/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #59: Report of Captain J. Frank Morgan, 14th CT, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #61: Report of Major Henry F. Chew, 12th NJ, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #62: Report of Lieutenant Colonel George F. Hopper, 10th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #63: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Francis E. Pierce, 108th NY, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #64: Report of Captain Charles McAnally, 69th PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #65: Report of Captain John H. Gallager, 106th PA, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #66: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Francis W. H. Baldwin, 7th WV, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #67: Report of Brigadier General Regis de Trobriand, commanding 3/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #68: Report of Brigadier General Regis de Trobriand, commanding 1/3/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #6: Report of Surg. Thomas A. McParlin, Medical Director, Army of the Potomac, Jan 1-Jun 30, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #70: Report of Brigadier General Byron R. Pierce, commanding 2/3/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #71: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General Robert McAllister, 11th NJ, commanding 3/3/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #72: Report of Bvt. Lieutenant Colonel John G. Hazard, 1st RI Lt Arty, commanding Arty/II/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #73: Report of Captain J. Webb Adams, 10th Btty MA Lt Arty, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #7: Report of Surg. John A. Lidell, Inspector of Medical and Hospital Dept, Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #9: Report of Captain Charles L. Davis, Chief Signal Officer, AotP, March 29-April 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #9: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General Henry L. Abbot, 1st CT HA, commanding Siege Train, Jan 1-Mar 31, 1865
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: At the “Breakthrough”
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Duty and Death Rather Than Dishonor
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Engineer, Surgeon and Hero
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Gallant Vermonters
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Language More Forceful Than Elegant
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Made Good Use of the Enemy’s Weapons
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Thrilling Episodes Around Petersburg
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: “They Can’t Drive You Out of Here”
- SHS Papers: Volume 10: History of Lane’s North Carolina Brigade at Petersburg, Part 4 by James H. Lane
- SHS Papers: Volume 10: History of Lane’s North Carolina Brigade at Petersburg, Part 5 by James H. Lane
- The 12th Mississippi at Fort Gregg, April 2, 1865: Defenders and Casualties by Shelly Liebler
- The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- 150 Years Ago Today at Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- 150 Years Ago Today: The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 1
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 2
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 3
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 4
- BEARSS MAP: The Breakthrough (VI Corps), April 2, 1865 TOPO
- CV: V1N3: Story from the Ranks (April 2, 1865)
- LT: April 2, 1865 Theodore Lyman
- LT: May 9, 1865 Philip W. Pringle
- MOLLUS IL V2: The Old Vermont Brigade by Aldace F. Walker
- MOLLUS WI V1: Assault on the Lines of Petersburg, April 2, 1865 by Charles H. Anson
- NP: April 14, 1865 Vermont Watchman: 3rd Vermont Battery at the Breakthrough, April 2, 1865
- OR LI P1: Report of Colonel Richard N. Batchelder, Chief Quartermaster, AotP, June 30, 1864 – June 30, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #105: Reports of Major General Horatio G. Wright, commanding VI/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #106: Reports of Bvt. Major General Frank Wheaton, commanding 1/VI/AotP, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #107: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General William H. Penrose, 15th NJ, commanding 1/1/VI/AotP, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #108: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Baldwin Hufty, 4th NJ, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #109: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General Joseph E. Hamblin, 65th NY, commanding 2/1/VI/AotP, April 1-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #110: Reports of Lieutenant Colonel Henry C. Fisk, 65th NY, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #111: Report of Bvt. Colonel Egbert Olcott, 121st NY, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #112: Report of Lieutenant Colonel John Harper, 95th PA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #113: Report of Captain James T. Stuart, 49th PA, commanding SS/1/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #114: Report of Colonel Oliver Edwards, 37th MA, commanding 3/1/VI/AotP, April 1-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #115: Reports of Captain Archibald Hopkins, 37th MA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #116: Report of Bvt. Colonel Baynton J. Hickman, 49th PA, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #117: Report of Colonel Isaac C. Bassett, 82nd PA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #118: Report of Major William C. Gray, 119th PA, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #119: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Elisha H. Rhodes, 2nd RI, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #120: Report of Colonel Thomas S. Allen, 5th WI, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #121: Report of Bvt. Major General George W. Getty, commanding 2/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #122: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Charles A. Milliken, 43rd NY, Pickets/2/VI/AotP, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #123: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General James M. Warner, 1st VTHA, commanding 1/2/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #124: Report of Captain B. Frank Hean, 93rd PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #125: Report of Captain Bernhard Gessler, 98th PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #126: Report of Major James McGregor, 139th PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #127: Report of Bvt. Major General Lewis A. Grant, commanding 2/2/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #128: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Ronald A. Kennedy, 5th VT, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #129: Report of Colonel Thomas W. Hyde, 1st ME Vet, commanding 3/2/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #130: Report of Captain Augustus Merrill, Co B, 1st ME (Veteran), April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #131: Reports of Brigadier General Truman Seymour, commanding 3/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #132: Reports of Colonel William S. Truex, 14th NJ, commanding 1/3/VI/AotP, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #134: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Jacob J. Janeway, 14th NJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #135: Reports of Colonel Andrew N. McDonald, 106th NY, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #136: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Charles Bogardus, 151st NY, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #137: Report of Captain James Tearney, 87th PA, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #138: Report of Lieutenant Colonel George B. Damon, 10th VT, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #139: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General J. Warren Keifer, 110th OH, commanding 2/3/VI/AotP, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #140: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Joseph C. Hill, 6th MD, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #141: Reports of Lieutenant Colonel James W. Snyder, 9th NYHA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #142: Reports of Bvt. Colonel Otho H. Binkley, 110th OH, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #144: Report of Colonel Benjamin F. Smith, 126th OH, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #145: Reports of Major William G. Williams, 126th OH, commanding 67th PA, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #146: Reports of Colonel Matthew R. McClennan, 138th PA, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #147: Report of Bvt. Major Andrew Cowan, 1st Btty NY Lt Arty, commanding Arty/VI/AotP, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #149: Reports of Bvt. Captain Orsamus R. Van Etten, 1st NY Btty, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #150: Report of Bvt. Major William A. Harn, 3rd NY Btty, April 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #152: Reports of Lieutenant John R. Brinckle, Btty E 5th US Arty, April 2-6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #19: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General Henry L. Abbot, 1st CTHA, commanding Siege Train, March 29-April 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #1: Report of Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant, commanding U.S. Army, March 1864-May, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #220: Report of Lieutenant Frederick J. Amsden, Signal Corps Det/XXIV/AotJ, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #270: Report of Brigadier General William N. Pendleton, Chief of Artillery, ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #272: Report of Brigadier General James H. Lane, commanding Lane/Wilcox/Third/ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Itineraries of the Army of the Potomac, Sheridan’s Cavalry Command, and the Army of the James, January-April 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Report of Major General George G. Meade, commanding Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #6: Report of Surg. Thomas A. McParlin, Medical Director, Army of the Potomac, Jan 1-Jun 30, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #7: Report of Surg. John A. Lidell, Inspector of Medical and Hospital Dept, Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #9: Report of Captain Charles L. Davis, Chief Signal Officer, AotP, March 29-April 9, 1865
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: At the “Breakthrough”
- The Breakthrough CWPT Map
- The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 1
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 2
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 3
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 4
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 Map 5
- BEARSS MAP: The Battle of Fort Mahone (IX Corps), April 2, 1865 TOPO
- Fort Mahone Diorama: April 2, 1865
- LT: April 2, 1865 Theodore Lyman
- LT: April 8, 1865 Samuel K. Miller
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 3 p.m. to 4 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 4 a.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 4:30 a.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 5 a.m. to 1 p.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, 5 a.m., April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MAP: Fort Mahone, Dusk, April 2, 1865 (Edward Alexander)
- MOLLUS ME V1: With the Seventh Maine Battery by Brevet Major William B. Lapham
- MOLLUS ME V2: In a Charge Near Fort Hell, Petersburg, April 2, 1865 by Thomas P. Beals
- NP: April 2, 1965 Petersburg Progress-Index: Siege Centennial, Part 40: The Evacuation Of Petersburg
- OR XLVI P1 #153: Report of Major General John G. Parke, commanding IX/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #154: Report of Bvt. Major General Orlando B. Willcox, commanding 1/IX/AotP, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #155: Report of Colonel Samuel Harriman, 37th WI, commanding 1/1/IX/AotP, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #156: Report of Colonel Charles Waite, 27th MI, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #157: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Colwert K. Pier, 38th WI, commanding 109th NY, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #158: Report of Major Robert N. Roberts, 38th WI, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #167: Report of Brigadier General Simon G. Griffin, commanding 2/IX/AotP, Mar 25-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #168: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General John I. Curtin, 45th PA, commanding 1/2/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #169: Report of Brigadier General Simon G. Griffin, commanding 2/2/IX/AotP, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #170: Report of Bvt. Major General John F. Hartranft, commanding 3/IX/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #171: Report of Lieutenant Colonel William H. H. McCall, 200th PA, commanding 1/3/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #173: Report of Colonel Joseph A. Mathews, 205th PA, commanding 2/3/IX/AotP, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #174: Report of Colonel Robert C. Cox, 207th PA, commanding 2/3/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #175: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General John C. Tidball, 4th NYHA, commanding Arty/IX/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #176: Report of Captain Adelbert B. Twitchell, 7th ME Btty, Mar 30-Apr 12, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #177: Report of Bvt. Major Charles A. Philips, Btty E MA Lt Arty, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #178: Report of Captain Richard S. Milton, 9th MA Btty, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #17: Report of Lieutenant Charles B. Phillips, U. S. Corps of Engineers, IX/AOTP, March 28-April 4, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #181: Report of Bvt. Major Christian Woerner, 3rd NJ Btty, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #182: Report of Captain David F. Ritchie, Btty C 1st NY Lt Arty, Mar 30-Apr 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #185: Report of Captain Samuel A. McClellan, Btty G 1st NY Lt Arty, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #186: Report of Bvt. Major George Breck, Btty L 1st NY Lt Arty, Mar 29-Apr 6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #188: Report of Captain John. B. Eaton, 27th NY Btty, April 1-2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #189: Report of Bvt. Major Jacob Roemer, 34th NY Btty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #190: Report of Captain William McClelland, Btty B 1st PA Lt Arty, April 1-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #191: Report of Captain Samuel H. Rhoads, Btty D PA Lt Arty, Mar 30-Apr 2, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #193: Report of Bvt. Brig. Gen. Charles H. T. Collis, 114th PA, commanding IndBrig/IX/AotP, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #194: Report of Colonel Charles F. Walcott, 61st MA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #195: Report of Colonel Jacob B. Hardenbergh, 80th NY (20th Militia), April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #196: Report of Colonel Andrew H. Tippin, 68th PA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #197: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Robert E. Winslow, 68th PA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #198: Report of Captain John R. Waterhouse, 114th PA, April 2-3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #19: Reports of Bvt. Brigadier General Henry L. Abbot, 1st CTHA, commanding Siege Train, March 29-April 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #1: Report of Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant, commanding U.S. Army, March 1864-May, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #20: Report of Lieutenant William H. Rogers, commanding det. 1st CTHA, March 31-April 3, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #270: Report of Brigadier General William N. Pendleton, Chief of Artillery, ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Itineraries of the Army of the Potomac, Sheridan’s Cavalry Command, and the Army of the James, January-April 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Report of Major General George G. Meade, commanding Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #6: Report of Surg. Thomas A. McParlin, Medical Director, Army of the Potomac, Jan 1-Jun 30, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #7: Report of Surg. John A. Lidell, Inspector of Medical and Hospital Dept, Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- 150 Years Ago Today at Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- 150 Years Ago Today: The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- The Confederate Alamo: Bloodbath at Petersburg’s Fort Gregg on April 2, 1865 by John J. Fox III
- Book Review: Such Hard and Severe Service: The 85th Pennsylvania in the Civil War, Volume II, 1864-1865 by Dan Clendaniel
- BTC Notes: The Confederate Alamo: Bloodbath at Petersburg’s Fort Gregg on April 2, 1865
- CLARK NC: 33rd North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- CLARK NC: 37th North Carolina at the Siege of Petersburg
- Confederate Defenders at Fort Gregg: April 2, 1865 by Bill Furr
- CT AG 65-66: Report of Captain Francis G. Hickerson, 10th Connecticut, of operations April 2-18, 1865
- February 28, 1904: A Surgeon’s Defense of the Garrison
- LT: April 2, 1865 Theodore Lyman
- LT: April 27, 1865 Homer A. Plimpton (39th Illinois)
- NP: April 14, 1865 Vermont Watchman: 3rd Vermont Battery at the Breakthrough, April 2, 1865
- NP: April 2, 1965 Petersburg Progress-Index: Siege Centennial, Part 40: The Evacuation Of Petersburg
- NP: January 12, 1888 Wheeling (WV) Intelligencer: Flagstaff of the 12th WV
- NP: October 1, 1884 The Clarion (Jackson, MS): The Death Grapple at Petersburg: Last Days of Harris’ Mississippi Brigade, Part 4
- NP: October 8, 1884 The Clarion (Jackson, MS): The Surrender-Homeward Bound!: Last Days of Harris’ Mississippi Brigade, Part 5
- NP: September 15, 1902 New Orleans Times-Picayune: Harris’ Mississippi Brigade at the Siege of Petersburg and Appomattox
- NP: September 24, 1884 The Clarion (Jackson, MS): The Death Grapple at Petersburg: Last Days of Harris’ Mississippi Brigade, Part 3
- NT: April 25, 1889 National Tribune: Piedmont and Fort Gregg
- NT: July 9, 1891 National Tribune: The 3d Vt. Battery at Fort Gregg by C.A. Story
- NT: March 6, 1902 National Tribune: Capture of Fort Gregg by G.K. Campbell
- NT: May 1, 1890 National Tribune: Front of Petersburg, Fort Gregg, April 2, 1865
- NT: May 15, 1902 National Tribune: Defending Fort Gregg by George W. Kennedy
- OR XLVI P1 #105: Reports of Major General Horatio G. Wright, commanding VI/AotP, Mar 30-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #149: Reports of Bvt. Captain Orsamus R. Van Etten, 1st NY Btty, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #213: Report of Major General Edward O. C. Ord, commanding Army of the James, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #214: Report of Bvt. Brigadier General Peter S. Michie, Chief Engineer, AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #219: Report of Major General John Gibbon, commanding XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #220: Report of Lieutenant Frederick J. Amsden, Signal Corps Det/XXIV/AotJ, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #221: Reports of Brigadier General Robert S. Foster, commanding 1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #222: Report of Colonel Thomas O. Osborn, 39th IL, commanding 1/1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #223: Report of Captain Homer A. Plympton, 39th IL, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #224: Report of Colonel Alvin C. Voris, 67th OH, Apr 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #225: Report of Colonel James C. Briscoe, 199th PA, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #226: Report of Colonel George B. Dandy, 100th NY, commanding 3/1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #227: Report of Captain Francis G. Hickerson, 10th CT, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #228: Report of Captain Henry C. Adams, 11th ME, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #229: Report of Captain Edwin Nichols, 100th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #230: Report of Colonel Harrison S. Fairchild, 89th NY, commanding 4/1/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #231: Report of Lieutenant Colonel Edward A. True, 8th ME, Mar 27-Apr 6, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #233: Report of Captain William Dobie, 89th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #234: Report of Colonel John B. Murray, 148th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #235: Report of Lieutenant Colonel William H. McNary, 158th NY, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #236: Report of Captain George H. Hill, 55th PA, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #240: Report of Bvt. Major General John W. Turner, commanding Ind/XXIV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #241: Reports of Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Potter, 34th MA, commanding 1/Ind/XXIV/AotJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #243: Reports of Colonel William B. Curtis, 12th WV, commanding 2/Ind/XXIV/AotJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #244: Reports of Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris, commanding 3/Ind/XXIV/AotJ, April 2-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #245: Report of Captain George T. Anthony, 17th NY Btty, Mar 26-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #255: Report of Colonel Samuel C. Armstrong, 8th USCT, Mar 28-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #259: Report of Colonel William W. Woodward, 116th USCT, commanding 3/2/XXV/AotJ, Mar 27-Apr 9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #270: Report of Brigadier General William N. Pendleton, Chief of Artillery, ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #272: Report of Brigadier General James H. Lane, commanding Lane/Wilcox/Third/ANV, April 1-9, 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Itineraries of the Army of the Potomac, Sheridan’s Cavalry Command, and the Army of the James, January-April 1865
- OR XLVI P1 #4: Report of Major General George G. Meade, commanding Army of the Potomac, Mar 29-Apr 9, 1865
- Petersburg Medals of Honor: Thrilling Episodes Around Petersburg
- Review: The Confederate Alamo: Bloodbath at Petersburg’s Fort Gregg on April 2, 1865
- SHS Papers: Volume 10: History of Lane’s North Carolina Brigade at Petersburg, Part 4 by James H. Lane
- SHS Papers: Volume 31: Fort Gregg Again: A Surgeon’s Defense of the Garrison
- SHS Papers: Volume 3: Defence of Fort Gregg by James H. Lane et al
- SHS Papers: Volume 3: The Defence of Fort Gregg by Napier Bartlett
- SHS Papers: Volume 4: Defence of Batteries Gregg and Whitworth, and the Evacuation of Petersburg by C.M. Wilcox
- SHS Papers: Volume 8: Defence of Battery Gregg by N.H. Harris
- SHS Papers: Volume 9: Battery Gregg-Reply to General N. H. Harris
- SHS Papers: Volume 9: The Defence of Battery Gregg-General Lane’s Reply to General Harris by James H. Lane
- The 12th Mississippi at Fort Gregg, April 2, 1865: Defenders and Casualties by Shelly Liebler
- The Third Battle of Petersburg: April 2, 1865
- Who Defended Fort Gregg?: A Confederate Controversy, Part 1
Source:
- The CWSAC site classifies the final battles around Petersburg after Fort Stedman as belonging to the Appomattox Campaign. The Siege of Petersburg Online: Beyond the Crater classifies the six battles around Petersburg from March 29-April 2, 1865 as belonging to Grant’s Ninth Offensive against Petersburg, a part of the Petersburg Campaign. ↩
- CWSAC Battle Summary ↩
In regard to Thomas Roche death studies:
http://www.petersburgproject.org/the-rebel-in-the-road.html