≡ Menu

SOPO Editor’s Note: For some reason, this article was printed in two consecutive weekly issues of the Sunday Mercury, once on August 14, 1864 and once in this issue, the August 21, 1864 edition.  I have chosen to leave both up.  Consult this version because I found out why Colonel Gates was in charge at City Point, and not Provost Marshall Marsena Patrick.

One Hundred and Seventieth Regiment, N[ew]. Y[ork]. V[olunteers].

[Special Correspondence of the N. Y. Sunday Mercury.]

CAMP NEAR PETERSBURG, VA., August 10. [1864]

Fearful Explosion at City Point—Dreadful Loss of Life—Consternation of the Negroes—Daring of the Irish Legion, Etc.

Since my last, nothing of special interest has occurred in this Department to interfere with the equanimity of the Second Corps, or, in fact, with the Army of the Potomac, further than new and then some brisk exchanges of musketry on the part of the pickets in front of Petersburg.  Yesterday [August 9, 1864], however, the writer was at City Point, hunting up some contrabands to take charge of a portion of our culinary department, and he had not been more than fairly seated with Brig. Van Rensselaer, commanding the Twentieth New York Militia [aka 80th New York], enjoying a beautiful glass, or should I say ten, of ice-water, than one of the most fearful reports of, as it appeared, of shell, grape, canister, and musketry that ever vied with the elements in their hissing sounds, took place, dealing death and destruction in every direction. The greatest consternation that ever affected white or black men spread far and near; negroes, male and female, rushed in every direction; white men—the majority of them veterans of many hard-fought battles—stood aghast; officers, who commanded many a fierce charge, and whose scars betokened many a hard struggle with the enemy, stood almost petrified. In fact, so sudden and so terrific was the explosion, that description is impossible.1

ExplosionAtCityPointAugust91864

This image shows the destruction resulting from the blast described in this letter to the Sunday Mercury.

Quiet being partly restored, we emerged from our canvas shelter to learn the cause. We were not more than two hundred yards from where the explosion took place, and on casting our eyes around, we found the ground literally covered with shot and shell, and near where we stood, we picked about twenty as beautiful specimens of man-annihilators as Jeff Davis can boast of. Thank Providence! none of them came in contact with our craniums. From here we proceeded down to the scene of the catastrophe, and what was our astonishment to find houses, docks, boats, tents, in a state of perfect wreck! dead and dying strewn among the ruins; bodies torn to pieces; an arm here, a head there, a leg and other portions of the human frame mangled to pieces, at some places a distance of two hundred yards; muskets and rifles bent into every imaginable shape; ordnance-stores, including almost everything in the vocabulary, lying helter-skelter; and ammunition, of all sorts and sizes, covering the ground as far as the eye could reach. Detachments from the different regiments stationed there soon arrived on the ground, and immediately set to work removing the ruins about the barge which had exploded, and quiet reigned once more. Body after body was extricated—some dead, others dying, mangled in the most fearful manner, and the groans of the poor fellows who had any life left were pitiable in the extreme.

Colonel [Theodore G.] Gates, commandant of the post, and Brig. [Major Walter A.?] Van Rensselaer, commanding Twentieth New York [Militia, aka 80th New York], having now arrived, everything went on like clock-work; and, indeed, too much praise cannot be bestowed on both these gentlemen for the manner in which they exerted themselves to restore order and relieve the wounded.2 We proceeded from here to the camp and houses in the village, and found about every tent more or less perforated, and the interior of the houses divested of their plaster—some of them not having a solitary pain [sic, pane] of glass left—yet, strange to say, very few were hurt; although from the appearance of the ground, it was very evident that there was ample cause for considerable mortality. After an hour or so, we visited the scene of the explosion again, and found that some twenty dead bodies, principally colored men, had already been extricated from the ruins, besides several who were fearfully wounded—many so badly, that amputation had to be resorted to. It was impossible to learn the exact amount of mortality or damage done, but, on a rough guess, we should think that one hundred covers the number of killed and wounded. The damage done to Government-property cannot be much less than half a million of dollars. All sorts of rumors are afloat as to the cause of the explosion, but are merely surmises. There is very little doubt but what it was purely accidental.3 So far as we were enabled to learn, a large barge was lying alongside of the wharf, loaded with ordnance and ordnance-stores, and was being unloaded, when suddenly an explosion took place, resulting in what I have already stated. It is very probable, and I do not see anything more likely, than as the barge was being unloaded at the time, some colored man, who was ignorant of what he was handling, dropped a percussion-shell, which immediately exploded, and hence the fearful catastrophe that followed. It is, nevertheless a matter which requires thorough investigation; for, if proper care was taken, no such accident could have happened. I forgot to mention that the steamtug (fire-boat) Chilli was on hand immediately after the occurrence, and got eight streams of water playing on the ruins, which was the cause of preventing any further disaster, for another barge lay quite near the scene, also loaded with ammunition.4

The [170th New York] regiment is in the best of health and spirits, encamped in a wood near Petersburg, waiting orders. We are expecting some active work again in a few days. Do advise Uncle Sam to allow us an opportunity to recruit. A regiment that has fought so manfully, and lost over two-thirds of its number in this campaign, and that has never been beaten, should have its ranks filled up.5

Yours, etc.                       A. O. P.6

Editor’s Note: This letter to the Sunday Mercury appears here due to Bill Styple’s fantastic book Writing and Fighting the Civil War, which is where I first learned about these amazing soldier letters.  You can purchase a copy of Writing and Fighting the Civil War at Belle Grove Publishing.

If you are interested in helping us transcribe newspaper articles like the one above, please CONTACT US.

Article Image

18640821NYSundayMercuryP7C2 170thNY

Source:

  1. SOPO Editor’s Note: This was the famous August 9, 1864 Explosion at City Point, where an ordnance barge blew up and caused massive destruction in its vicinity, obliterating another barge as well as a building on shore. Interestingly, this was no accident.  Confederate saboteur John Maxwell managed to sneak a “horological torpedo,” a time bomb, on board the vessel, where it eventually detonated with spectacular effect, as this eyewitness account so effectively demonstrates.
  2. SOPO Editor’s Note: This is an interesting statement.  Gates was officially the commander of the 80th New York, or 20th Militia, in the Official Records at the end of July as well as the end of August 1864.  The 80th New York was part of the Provost Guard, which was stationed at City Point during this time.  On August 9 at least, it seems Gates was temporarily in charge of the portions of the Provost Guard at City Point, during which time Van Rensselaer, probably Major Walter A. Rensselaer, was in charge of the regiment itself. The Provost Guard as a whole was commanded by Brigadier General Marsena Patrick.  After consulting Inside Lincoln’s Army¸ the published version of Patrick’s Diary, page 412, it seems Patrick had for a long time been settled in a camp 1 ½ miles west of the Birchett House, which itself was about 2 miles south of City Point.  See this map for its exact location.  Patrick was not present at City Point at the time of the explosion, and good thing too, because his offices there were covered in debris after the event!
  3. SOPO Editor’s Note: As I mentioned earlier, this was no accident!
  4. SOPO Editor’s Note: I have searched all of my usual reference works as well as online and I can find no evidence of a steam tug named “Chilli,” “Chili,” or “Chile” anywhere.  If you know which vessel this is, please CONTACT US.
  5. SOPO Editor’s Note: The 170th New York was part of “Corcoran’s Irish Legion,” a second Irish Brigade of sorts which was originally the Fourth Brigade, Second Division, Second Corps, AotP when they arrived at the front in May 1864, but was made the Second Brigade on June 26, 1864 after consolidations. They had indeed suffered severely during the Overland Campaign. This brigade had been in backwaters of the war and serving in Washington, D. C. from formation in late 1862 through early 1864.
  6. “One Hundred and Seventieth Regiment, N. Y. V.” Sunday Mercury (New York, New York). August 21, 1864, p. 7 col. 2
{ 0 comments }

[Engagement of Federal fleet with Confederate ironclads and shore batteries at Howlett’s, June 21, 1864.]

Report of Flag-Officer [Jonathan K.] Mitchell, C. S. Navy, commanding James River Squadron.

C. S. S. Ironclad Virginia,
Flagship James River Squadron, off Graveyard, June 22, 1864.

Illustration of Howlett Battery and Trent's Reach in the London Illustrated News

Battery Dantzler and the Confederate James River Squadron combined forces against the Union monitors in Trent’s Reach on June 21, 1864. (October 22, 1864 London Illustrated News)

Sir: On Monday morning, the 20th, it was arranged with Major-General Pickett that Battery Dantzler, at Howlett’s, should open fire on the enemy’s monitors in Trent’s Reach at noon yesterday, and that the forces under my command would be in position to act simultaneously. It was also understood that Brigadier-General G. W. C. Lee would, on the north side, so far as practicable, operate against the enemy’s wooden vessels below Varina (or Aiken’s) with a force of artillery, and to drive in any pickets he might have out.

At noon, or very soon after, Battery Dantzler opened on the enemy, with what results I have been unable to learn.

A few minutes after noon the Virginiain a position near Cox’s Landing, and the Fredericksburgnear the ferry, together with the gunboats HamptonNansemondDrewryRoanokeand Beaufortopened with shell upon the enemy’s wooden gunboats in Trent’s [Reach] and Varina Reach, and continued their fire till near sunset. As the distance of the enemy was generally near the extreme range of our guns, and the fire was directed over high intervening banks, the aim could only be determined by the smoke of the enemy’s guns or by directions from lookouts on elevated positions on shore. It probably did little damage to the enemy; certainly none that we could discover. A double ender at Aiken’s was driven by the fire of the gunboats from her position to one lower down, apparently covered by Aiken’s house. The fire from the enemy in Trent’s Reach appeared to be directed chiefly, if not entirely, at Battery Dantzler, and that directed at our squadron was mostly from the double-ender near Aiken’s. His fire was without effect in the squadron, from which there is no damage or casualties to report.1

The ironclad Richmondin getting underway, parted her wheel chain, which fouled her propeller, and the vessel remains disabled. She has been towed up near the obstructions, or Chaffin’s Bluff, where it is hoped the propeller will be cleared.

I invite your attention to the report (a copy enclosed) of Lieutenant Commanding [William H.] Parker for the particulars of the accident, showing also, as it does, the creditable efforts he made to cooperate with the rest of the squadron and the part taken by him.2

This ship (the Virginiawas about proceeding to take a more eligible position near Howlett’s, when it was discovered that the piston was deranged; on removing the cylinder head a chisel was found in the cylinder, which, but for the timely discovery, might have caused serious damage. The engine was in good condition for service again in the afternoon, but too late as to time and tide for taking up the desired position.

The marine guard and a division of small-arms men were landed at Cox’s to picket the high ground close to Dutch Gap; no force of the enemy was discovered on shore. The marine guard fired into one of the enemy’s transports passing down the river.

The bow gun of the Nansemond burst on the first fire near the muzzle, without other damage, fortunately, of any kind. A full report of the accident has been made to the office of ordnance and hydrography by Flag-Lieutenant Minor, ordnance officer of the squadron. The Nansemond will be sent up to land her burst gun, when she will return to the squadron till another is ready for her or the burst one rendered serviceable.

A commendable spirit and energy were displayed by the officers and crews of the command, which afford a gratifying assurance that their best efforts may be relied upon whenever an opportunity for a more close and serious action shall occur.

I was informed by Major [Francis W.] Smith, commanding Battery Dantzler, last evening that the battery was to be masked last night and that it would not be ready to open on the enemy again for two or three days.

The gunboat Hampton will be sent to Richmond today for the purpose of being taken on the ways for the examination of her shaft, which seems to be deranged, supposed to be caused by the propeller striking a log. I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

Jno. [Jonathan] K. Mitchell,
Commanding James River Squadron.

Hon. S[tephen]. R. Mallory,
Secretary of the Navy, Richmond, Va.3

Map of the June 21, 1864 Action at Howlett's Bluff

This map shows the June 21, 1864 Action at Howlett’s Bluff, covered in this report by Flag Officer Mitchell.

Source/Notes:

  1. SOPO Editor’s Note: This double ender was probably the flagship Malvern, retiring after signaling the Agawam to open fire.  The Agawam seems to have been somewhere between Dutch Gap and Trent’s Reach, given that she fired on Battery Danztler with her forward guns and the Confederate warships with her aft weapons.  The report from the Agawam’s captain in Volume X of the Naval Official Records indicates she fired some shots at the Confederate ships, the only report which mentions a non-ironclad vessel doing so.
  2. SOPO Editor’s Note: Although quite a few reports of Mitchell’s subordinates are included in the pages following this report, I cannot find Parker’s official report of the action which Mitchell lists as enclosed here. If you know where this report might be located or if it even exists, please Contact Us. Interestingly, Parker wrote a book of reminiscences on his life after the war, and he does give a brief description of this fight in that book on pages 337338, calling it a “fiasco.”
  3. Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, Series 1, Volume 10, pp. 186188
{ 0 comments }

OR XL P1 (Broadfoot Sup.) #1: Excerpt from a Report Appended to the Diary of 1st Lt. Edmund D. Halsey, 15th NJ, June 13-July 10, 18641

SOPO Editor’s Note: The Broadfoot Supplement to the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies is rare and not sold in single volumes.  As a courtesy to researchers, I’m making available summaries of the reports contained in this set relevant to the Siege of Petersburg.

Image of Official Records, Volume XL, Part 1 and Broadfoot Supplement to the ORs, Volume 7Summary: This report written by First Lieutenant Edmund D. Halsey of the 15th New Jersey was tucked away in the pages of his diary, and was not present in the original Official Records.  In this short report of less than a page, Halsey covers his Sixth Corps regiment’s movement from Cold Harbor to Bermuda Hundred and Petersburg, their role in the Battle of Jerusalem Plank Road and the First Battle of Reams’ Station, and their eventual departure for Washington, D. C. in early July 1864.

Source: Excerpt from Appendix E, diary of First Lieutenant Edmund D. Halsey, United States Army Military History Institute Library, Carlisle Barracks

Available Online?: No

Source:

  1. Supplement to the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Part I, Reports, Vol. 7, pp. 217-218
{ 0 comments }

P15BenningBde18640919FBConfederate Inspection Report:

Benning’s Brigade, Field’s Division, First Corps, Army of Northern Virginia1

September 19, 1864

The Confederate Army of Northern Virginia produced inspection reports at approximately monthly intervals late in the Civil War.  Luckily, many of these reports have been preserved and are available on microfilm from the National Archives and Records Association. I have produced transcriptions of the key information from these reports. See the bottom of this page for freely downloadable transcriptions of most of these reports. This transcription is copyrighted by Brett Schulte and may not be distributed, changed, or reproduced in any manner without the written consent of the transcriber.

M935 Roll #: 10

Image # from Digitized Copy: 0047-0058.jpg

Date of Inspection: September 19, 1864

Commander: Colonel Dudley M. DuBose (of the 15th Georgia)

Inspection Location: Chaffin’s Farm near the James River

Aggregate Present & Absent: 1,8892

Aggregate Effective for the Field: 1,889

Officers and Men Present for Duty (PFD): 677

Weapons: Enfield Rifles, Springfield Rifles, and Richmond Rifles

Sub-Units:

  • 2nd Georgia, Lt. Col. William S. Shepherd, 144 officers and men PFD
  • 15th Georgia, Major Peter J. Shannon, 213 officers and men PFD
  • 17th Georgia, Lt. Col. William A. Barden, 139 officers and men PFD
  • 20th Georgia, Captain William Craig, 181 officers and men PFD

Downloadable Spreadsheet:

 

Source/Notes:

  1. Confederate Inspection Report P-15: Benning’s Brigade, September 19, 1864; Inspection Reports and Related Records Received By the Inspection Branch in the Confederate Adjutant and Inspector General’s Office. (National Archives Microfilm Publication M935, Roll 10: Inspection Reports P-12 – 39-P-24); War Department Collection of Confederate Records, Record Group 109; National Archives Building, Washington, D.C.
  2. SOPO Editor’s Note: Clearly the inspector was not accurately representing one of either “aggregate present & absent” or “aggregate effective for the field.” The former should be much larger at this point in the war. I wanted to point out the inspector filled out the report this way. I did not have a typo here.
{ 2 comments }

Confederate Secretary of the Navy Stephen R. Mallory received this telegram of the Action at Howlett’s Bluff on the evening of June 21, 1864.

[Engagement of Federal fleet with Confederate ironclads and shore batteries at Howlett’s, June 21, 1864.]

[Telegram.]

Flagship VirginiaJune 21, 18647 p. m.

At 12:15 today the Virginia and Fredericksburg took up position, the former below Cox’s Landing and the latter at the ferry, with the gunboats HamptonNansemondRoanokeBeaufortand Drewryand opened fire on the enemy’s wooden vessels in the lower part of Trent’s Reach and Varina Reach.

The Richmond parted her wheel rope, which fouled her propeller, and she remains disabled. She goes up near the obstructions to-night to have it cleared. I was about proceeding lower down the river, near Howlett’s, when the piston was discovered to be out of order. The cylinder was removed and a chisel found in the cylinder. The engine is now in working order again. This vessel, the Fredericksburg, and the gunboats have directed their fire to-day against the enemy’s wooden vessels in Trent’s Reach and Varina Reach.

Jno. [Jonathan] K. Mitchell,
Commanding James River Squadron.

Hon. S[TEPHEN]. R. MALLORY,
Secretary of the Navy.1

Map of the June 21, 1864 Action at Howlett's Bluff

This map shows the June 21, 1864 Action at Howlett’s Bluff, covered in this telegram sent by Flag Officer Mitchell. 

Source/Notes:

  1. Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, Series 1, Volume 10, p. 186
{ 0 comments }

FROM THE [PETERSBURG] FRONT.

—–

NOTHING EXCITING AT THE FRONT—THE CANNON AGAIN AT WORK—A VIEW OF THE ENEMY’S OPERATIONS—THE UNERRING AIM OF OUR SHARPSHOOTERS—THE RAIDERS INTERCEPTED—A SHARP FIGHT—ENCOURAGING REPORTS, ETC., ETC.

—–

Since our report of yesterday [June 29, 1864], which brought a statement of the operations in this vicinity down to 12 o’clock, Tuesday night [midnight between June 28-29, 1864], we have observed nothing of very marked interest in our front. During all of Tuesday night [June 28, 1864], there was rather more than the usual amount of picket firing, with a loud report from the “big dogs of war,” every five minutes, and frequently at much shorter intervals.1

From an observatory, elevated far above the house tops2, we yesterday obtained a good view of Battery No. 2, from which there came no “glad tidings” for this section. From this same stand-point, we also saw the operations at Battery No 5, from which the Yankees were fulminating “doctrines” both dangerous and damnable, but they failed to “indoctrinate” (another term might be considered contraband,) any Confederate, so far as our knowledge extends.3

All beyond these Batteries, as far as the human vision could sweep, great clouds of dust were ascending, and other evidence of progress were palpable to the naked eye.

A youth who ventured much too near the enemy’s lines for comfort, in pursuit of an estray cow, informs us that the dust was raised by wagon trains, and says he counted thirty-one in a continuous line—We have no reason to doubt this statement, as it must require a large amount of “rolling stock” to haul only grub and ammunition, for such a host of “miscegenators.”4

We are happy it is in our power to state, that the enemy have made but little progress in their contemplated flanking movement on our right. They have manifested a great disposition to push matters to extremes on their left, as it brings them in the vicinity of the Weldon Railroad, and the poor, misguided creatures think we depend mainly on that road for supplies.5 The truth is, that our army and our people could live out “the lease of nature,” if another pound of meat or grain of corn, were not to be transported over that track for twenty months to come. We give this information to the invaders, and hope it will not be deemed contraband by the authorities.

We have it from good authority—one of the Yankee newspaper correspondents—that our sharp shooters have been doing a good work, in reducing the number of the enemy. They fall by scores every day before the unerring aim of the Southern rifle, and we hope our boys who are detailed for this sharp practice, may persevere in the good work. Their fire is telling with fine effect in the Yankee ranks. See letter to the Boston Transcript, which we publish in to-day’s Express. Should the Transcript proprietors see this, they will pardon us for the liberty we take with their correspondence.

The many wiseacres who crowd our street corners, and shake their heads with such a knowing nod, and predict with such emphatic gestures, that a general engagement is about to take place, have so frequently proved to be false prophets, that we hope they will hereafter withhold their prophecies. Their course only tends to excite the people, and all should now endeavor to allay, rather than create excitement.

THE RAIDERS—SEVERAL VERY ENCOURAGING REPORTS—BRIG. GEN. WILSON SEVERELY PUNISHED FOR HIS CONTUMACIOUS OPINION OF SOUTHERN CAVALRY.

22456vWilsonKautzRaid

Wilson’s Raiders damaged railroads, but they also damaged a lot of other property during their raid, before almost meeting with disaster. (July 30, 1864 Harper’s Weekly)

Our city was rife with rumors at an early hour yesterday [June 29, 1864], to the effect, that Wilson’s great raid6 had terminated much sooner than was contemplated, and that he was returning at a much earlier day and by a much shorter route than many anticipated. To give all these rumors would require much more time and space than we now have at our command, but we have enquired at every source likely to give us correct information, and we think we may state with certainty, that the raiders have been again encountered, and subjected to a much severer castigation than they have heretofore received.7

It seems that the enemy found the line of the Danville Railroad a very unpleasant route, after the attempt to burn the Staunton River bridge, and hastily set about retracing his steps, striking for City Point through Lunenburg, by way of Lawrenceville, Brunswick, Dinwiddie Courthouse, Stony Creek and possibly Jarratt’s Depot. The last two mentioned places are depots on the Petersburg and Weldon Railroad.8

On Tuesday [June 28, 1864], at 12 o’clock, they were within four miles of Lawrenceville, with Gen. W. H. F. [“Rooney”] Lee close behind them, and in hot pursuit. A courier reached here at one o’clock yesterday [June 29, 1864] morning, bringing this information, and a body of cavalry, between the Southern railroad and Dinwiddie Courthouse, immediately prepared to receive them with suitable honors. Our informant states that they were met yesterday [sic, June 28, 1864] morning at Sapponi [sic, Sappony]  church, a venerable Episcopal edifice, about seven miles southwest of Dinwiddie Courthouse. A sharp fight ensued, but it was of short duration, for with Gen. W. H. F. Lee on one side, and another bold cavalier, (whose name we withhold lest it be considered contraband,) [Wade Hampton] on the other, the arrogant Wilson was literally between two fires, and had to do some very rapid traveling.9 One report says, we captured twelve hundred prisoners, but this we must decline accepting as strictly correct, until we get the official report. But we have the evidence of a prisoner, who was captured at an early hour, and reached here about twelve o’clock, for stating that the enemy were defeated, and retreated, leaving 39 dead on the field, and several wounded.—Many prisoners, it is also stated, fell into our hands.10

Heavy firing was heard about ten o’clock [on the morning of June 29, 1864] in the vicinity of Reams’ Station, and it is reported that this was caused by an engagement with four hundred of the enemy, who had separated from Wilson, with the hope of reaching Gen. Grant, and asking that reinforcements be sent to the braggart.11

Another report states that quite a formidable body of the enemy, supposed to have numbered 900, were encountered yesterday at Stony Creek, and they also were made to show their heels to a brigade of our brave horsemen.12

We are compelled to write this account at an early hour (7 p. m.,) [on the night of June 29, 1864] to get it in type. We hope before going to press that it will be in our power to give additional information, confirming all, or at least a portion of these encouraging reports.

DEPREDATIONS OF THE RAIDERS.

From a citizen of Petersburg, who has just returned from Nottoway, and who was compelled to walk 20 miles to get here, we have some information of the thieving and plundering of Wilson and his followers, in the counties of Dinwiddie, Nottoway and Lunenburg.13

From Mr. Robert Snyder, an estimable citizen of Dinwiddie, they stole 40 gallons of wine, and twenty-five barrels of corn.

From Mr. Edward Scott and brother they stole some 40 or 50 negroes.

At Ford’s Depot, they arrested Mr. Pegram, the Railroad agent, and confined him in a hog pen. Mr. Pegram had given his watch and $1,800 to a servant for safe keeping, but it is stated that the negro proved recreant to his trust, and went off with the raiders, carrying the watch and money with him.

From Mr. Freeman Eppes, of Nottoway, they stole 27 likely negroes.

From Thomas H. Campbell, Esq., they stole all his negro men, but two. They also plundered Mr. Campbell’s house of all its valuable furniture, silver plate, etc. Dr. Campbell, the father of Thomas H. and a neighbor, was also robbed of every thing; and Mr. Algernon Campbell, a brother, shared a similar fate. Mr. T. H. Campbell is a son-in-law of the Rev. Dr. Pryor, and the Dr.’s escape, probably incensed the raiders against the family. All necessary information was abtained [sic, obtained] from Mr. T. H. Campbell’s long trusted carriage driver, who was re-captured, piloting two Yankee raiders, by the Hon. Roger A. Pryor, who accompanied Gen. W. H. F. Lee in pursuit of the Vandals.

From Mr. Lee Hawkes, of Nottoway, they stole and burnt 150 bales of cotton. Others in Nottoway suffered great losses, but our informant could not recollect the names.

From Mr. Edward Stokes, of Lunenburg, the raiders stole a set of silver service, for which was paid $5,000 before the war.—They also took all of Mr. Stokes’ negro men, and much gold and silver coin.

The residence of Capt. Wm. A. Adams, who formerly commanded the Dinwiddie cavalry, was robbed of every light article of value it contained, the furniture broken up, and the house then committed to the flames.

We hear many other reports of valuable residences ransacked and burnt, but as they are not authentic, we forbear giving particulars. We presume, however, when full and authentic accounts, shall have been received, that it will be safe to estimate the loss of property by this raid, at $1,000,000, if not more.

SHERIDAN’S CAVALRY.

It was represented last night [night of June 28-29, 1864] that Sheridan’s cavalry crossed the [Weldon] railroad at or near Reams’ Station, at an early hour yesterday morning [June 29, 1864], but this is not authentic. Indeed, we think it very improbable, if the account we have of the disposition of our forces be correct. But it is idle to speculate on mere rumor now. To-day [June 30, 1864] will, in all probability, put speculation at rest, and give us full and reliable particulars.14

—–

THE VERY LATEST!

—–

CAPTURE OF AN ENTIRE YANKEE BRIGADE—GENERAL WILSON BELIEVED TO BE AMONG THE NUMBER.

—–

A batch of prisoners who were brought in last night [June 29, 1864] at half-past eleven o’clock, confirm the rumored capture of 1200 of Wilson’s raiders.

These men say that it was an entire Brigade, and that they were captured at or near Stony Creek.15

They also state that Gen. [James H.] Wilson was with this Brigade, and it is believed that he is among the captured.16

These prisoners were taken in a fight yesterday afternoon [June 29, 1864], near Reams’ station, and the guard who brought them in informed us that they conversed with one man who had seen the prisoners at Stony Creek, but did not know that Gen. Wilson was among them. We took horses, arms and equipments, and about 400 negroes, who were following the Vandals.

There was heavy fighting yesterday [June 29, 1864] in the vicinity of Reams’, commencing as early as 8 or 9 o’clock [in the morning]. The enemy’s cavalry were strongly posted behind a rude fortification, which they had hastily thrown up. Our men charged them across an open field a half a mile in length, and were repulsed, and the enemy closing around them, captured the 10th and 14th Alabama regiments, of Wilcox’s old Brigade. We had but few cavalry during the fight at this particular point.

Yesterday afternoon [June 29, 1864], reinforcements came up, and another engagement took place, which resulted in the total defeat of the enemy, with heavy loss in killed, wounded and prisoners, and the re-capture of the two Alabama regiments.17

The guard represent that we have the enemy to the right [west] of the [Weldon] railroad, with every crossing strongly guarded, and the entire command will probably fall into our hands to-day [June 30, 1864].18

The prisoners brought in last night [June 29, 1864] represent the Third New York [Cavalry], Sixth [sic, Eighth?] Illinois [Cavalry], and First District [of] Columbia Cavalry.19—They were completely exhausted from long marching and covered with dirt, and state that they have suffered terribly from the heat, many of their men having fallen from sun stroke during the raid.

Col. [Everton J.] Conger [Lt. Colonel of the 1st DC cavalry], of New York, is badly wounded in the thigh, and several officers have been rendered totally helpless by the heat and fatigue of the journey.20

They say that the Brigade reported captured at Stony Creek, is commanded by Col. [George H.] Chapman, of Illinois [sic, Indiana].21

Gen. Kautz is in command of the raiders we fought yesterday [June 29, 1864] near Reams’ Station.22,23

If you are interested in helping us transcribe newspaper articles like the one above, please CONTACT US.

Article Image

Source/Notes:

  1. SOPO Editor’s Note: The “big dogs of war,” of course, were the large siege weapons the Union had brought up after the First Offensive.
  2. SOPO Editor’s Note: If you know where this observatory was located, presumably in Petersburg, please CONTACT US.
  3. SOPO Editor’s Note: “Battery No. 2” and “Battery No. 5” were positions along the Dimmock Line east of Petersburg which had been captured during the fighting at the Second Battle of Petersburg. Of course the Petersburg paper is going to continue to refer to them as they were known for so long. For a REALLY good map of the batteries along the Dimmock line east of Petersburg, see Earl J. Hess’ book In the Trenches at Petersburg¸ page 22. See also the excellent page on the Dimmock line at PetersburgProject.org.
  4. SOPO Editor’s Note: I’d like to comment on two things here.  First, I can find no evidence in the Official Records, Volume XL, Part 2 for any special Union activity east of Petersburg on the morning or afternoon of June 29, 1864. All of the focus seems to be how to get Wilson and Kautz safely back into Union lines utilizing Sheridan’s remaining cavalry divisions and Wright’s Sixth Corps of the Army of the Potomac.  It seems this was just the usual activity of supplying an immense army.  Second, Confederate papers often liked to use the word “miscegenators” when describing Union soldiers and armies.  For those who do not know, miscegenation is “…sexual intercourse between a white person and a member of another race.”  The Confederate papers liked to imply Union armies were in favor of Black males having intercourse with (especially Southern) White women, with the implication that this intercourse would be nonconsensual.
  5. SOPO Editor’s Note: The first portion of this paragraph refers to Grant’s Second Offensive against Petersburg, June 21-24, 1864, which resulted in the Battle of Jerusalem Plank Road and occurred at the same time as the Wilson-Kautz cavalry raid on Confederate supply lines west and southwest of Petersburg. You’ll see much more coverage of this raid in the rest of this article. As the Express notes, the Union army did not capture the Weldon Railroad in this offensive.  They would not permanently gain that foothold until the Fourth offensive in August 1864.
  6. SOPO Editor’s Note: “Wilson’s great raid” is, of course, what is now popularly referred to as the “Wilson-Kautz Raid.”  Led by James H. Wilson, who commanded his own cavalry division as well as that of August V. Kautz, led these Union cavalrymen on a raid from June 22-30, 1864 on the railroads west and southwest of Petersburg.  The Southside RR and Richmond & Danville RR were the targets.  Wilson had been turned back at Staunton River Bridge, and was doggedly pursued east by W. H. F. “Rooney” Lee’s Confederate cavalrymen.  Wade Hampton attempted to move from Petersburg to intercept Wilson before he could get back to Union lines, even utilizing some Southern infantry on June 29, 1864 at First Reams’ Station.  For a good map of Wilson’s route, see Hal Jespersen’s map on one of my 150th Anniversary posts on the raid. For the only book to focus specifically on the raid, now out of print and rather expensive, see Greg Eanes’ Destroy the Junction: The Wilson-Kautz Raid and the battle for Staunton River Bridge, June 21, 1864 to July 1, 1864.
  7. SOPO Editor’s Note: Wilson’s Raid had been prematurely ended after the failure to burn Staunton River Bridge on June 25, 1864.  It was a race back to the safety of the Union lines from that point forward.
  8. SOPO Editor’s Note: The Express was a little off on Wilson’s return route.  He took a more southerly route on the way back, trying to reach Stony Creek Station on the Weldon Railroad.  Read on to find out what happened.
  9. SOPO Editor’s Note: Wilson’s command was turned back from the Weldon Railroad by Hampton’s Confederate cavalry division 20+ miles south of Petersburg a little west of Stony Creek Station at the June 28, 1864 Battle of Sappony Church.  Contrary to the Express’ report, Rooney Lee’s cavalry division was not involved in this fight.   Hampton fought Wilson’s raiders with four brigades of cavalry.  On June 29, Wilson then attempted a roundabout move north to Reams’ Station.
  10. SOPO Editor’s Note: I have never seen a breakdown of the raiders’ casualties by fight, and I’m not sure that is even possible given the nature of a cavalry raid, but this Express article overstates the losses for sure.  The worst day of the fighting for Wilson was June 29, and we are not even to that portion of this article.  All told, in the entire raid, Wilson and Kautz suffered a combined 1,400 casualties, including what was to come after Sappony Church.
  11. SOPO Editor’s Note: This was actually Wilson’s entire division, but Wilson did indeed send a small detachment of men under Captain Whitaker to try to reach the main Union lines and ask for help.  See Jim Epperon’s page on Wilson’s Creek for this piece of information.
  12. SOPO Editor’s Note: This article is a bit scatter-brained in its execution.  Here, we are again referring to the June 28, 1864 Battle of Sappony Church. To be fair to the paper, they were receiving these reports in real time, and they were fairly impossible to verify in the way we can today in such a short amount of time.
  13. SOPO Editor’s Note: If you find one theme among the Richmond and Petersburg papers in late June and early July 1864, describing the “depredations” of Wilson’s Raiders, many of them factual, is it.  Not a lot was going on in the main lines of fortifications during this time frame, so this was the lead story for days.
  14. SOPO Editor’s Note: Meade and Grant sent Wright’s Sixth Corps in the direction of Reams Station on June 29, 1864, but they arrived after the fighting was over and did Wilson no appreciable good.
  15. SOPO Editor’s Note: The equivalent of an entire brigade became casualties, captured, wounded and missing, during the raid, but these men were not all from one brigade, but rather from two divisions of cavalry.
  16. SOPO Editor’s Note: This belief was incorrect.  Wilson made it safely to the James River on July 2, 1864.
  17. SOPO Editor’s Note: These various engagements on June 29, 1864 are collectively known as the First Battle of Reams’ Station. Note that the much more famous (at least when considering the various battles of the Richmond-Petersburg Campaign, anyway) battle near the same location fought on August 25, 1864 is the Second Battle of Reams’ Station. It is often simply referred to as the Battle of Reams’ Station, ignoring the cavalry/infantry engagement of June.
  18. SOPO Editor’s Note: This is not what happened.  Though the railroad was strongly guarded, Wilson and Kautz took different routes across the railroad and both managed to make the Union lines with their commands mostly intact though damaged significantly. Kautz arrived earlier than Wilson, but both were completely back by the evening of July 2, 1864, minus the 1,400 to 1,500 losses they suffered during the raid.
  19. SOPO Editor’s Note: The 3rd New York Cavalry and 1st DC Cavalry were part of Kautz’s Cavalry Division from the Army of the James.  The 6th Illinois Cavalry was never in the Eastern Theater, so the article is clearly incorrect here.  However, a detachment of the 8th Illinois Cavalry was present with the Army of the Potomac during this time, serving as raid and division commander James H. Wilson’s personal escort.  Clearly these prisoners came from that escort.
  20. SOPO Editor’s Note: See page 270 of this history of the 1st Maine Cavalry and 1st DC Cavalry for Conger’s wounding.
  21. SOPO Editor’s Note: Chapman was from Indiana, though born in Massachusetts.  He commanded the Second Brigade of Wilson’s Third Cavalry Division in the Army of the Potomac’s Cavalry Corps. This brigade was not captured in its entirety, as is implied in the newspaper article.  Chapman himself was not captured on this raid either, going on to lead his brigade in the 1864 Shenandoah Valley Campaign, as well as an entire division.
  22. SOPO Editor’s Note: Kautz and Wilson were both in the vicinity on June 29, 1864 before being separated during the fighting and forcing them to find separate ways back to the Union lines.
  23. “From the Front.” The Daily Express (Petersburg, VA). June 30, 1864, p. 2 col. 2-3
{ 0 comments }

Image of Cover of The Better Part of Valor by Cameron DavisUnit: 1st Vermont Cavalry

Unit Affiliation: (2), 3, Cavalry

Title: The Better Part of Valor: Albert Drury & His 1st Vermont Cavalry at Gettysburg, the Shenandoah Valley, and Beyond During the Civil War

Author: Albert Drury, Cameron Davis (editor)

SOPO’s Take: Cameron Davis sets the historical stage and covers interludes between the diaries, notebook and letters of 1st Vermont Cavalryman Albert Drury.  Drury’s writing provides readers with a good look at the movements of the 1st Vermont Cavalry from 1862-1865. There is quite a bit of Petersburg coverage, given that the 1st Vermont Cavalry was only there from June 12-early August 1864 and again in March-April 1865.  This is a an excellent book for a self-published effort.  I highly recommend it if you are interested in the 1st Vermont Cavalry, cavalry in general, and the Petersburg Campaign.

Book Summary/Review:

    SOPO Siege of Petersburg Book Notes:

      Publisher: Genoir

      Publication Date: 2017

      ISBN-13: 978-1530283880

      Links to Read/Buy:

      1. The Better Part of Valor: Albert Drury & His 1st Vermont Cavalry (Amazon.com)
      { 0 comments }

      [Engagement of Federal fleet with Confederate ironclads and shore batteries at Howlett’s, June 21, 1864.]

      Report of Lieutenant [Joseph M.] Gardner, C. S. Navy, commanding C. S. S. Beaufort.

      C. S. S. Beaufort,
      James River Squadron, June 21, 1864

      Sir: I am happy to report that this vessel has not been injured in the slightest degree to-day. I expended nine rounds, giving between 4 ½ degrees and 5 degrees elevation, and always aiming at the flash of the enemy’s guns, which could be distinctly seen from the masthead.

      I am well satisfied with the conduct of the officers and men under my command, and am confident that they will retain their presence of mind when brought to close action with the gunboats of the enemy.

      I am, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

      J[oseph]. M. Gardner,
      Lieutenant, Commanding.

      Flag-Officer Jno. [Jonathan] K. Mitchell,
      Commanding James River Squadron.1

      Map of the June 21, 1864 Action at Howlett's Bluff

      This map shows the June 21, 1864 Action at Howlett’s Bluff, covered in this report by Lt. Gardner.

      Source/Notes:

      1. Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion, Series 1, Volume 10, p. 186
      { 0 comments }

      Image of Official Records, Volume XLVI, Part 1 and Broadfoot Supplement to the ORs, Volume 7SOPO Editor’s Note: This is a listing of the reports published in Broadfoot Publishing’s Supplement to the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Part I, Reports, Vol. 7, pp. 697-702. If these reports had been found in time, they would have been included in The Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies in the War of the Rebellion, Volume XLVI, Pt. 1.  The latter volume focuses on the Richmond-Petersburg Campaign, aka The Siege of Petersburg, from January 1 to April 9, 1865. Please note THIS IS ONLY A LIST.  I DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THESE REPORTS! It is provided as a courtesy to researchers.

      January 1-April 9, 1865.—The Richmond, Virginia, Campaign.1

      Note: These reports belong with those in the Officials Records, Volume XLVI, Part 1.

       

      • Journal of Brigadier-General August Valentine Kautz, U. S. Army, April 2-9, 1865. ….. 705

       

      • Report of Major George Ager, First Connecticut Heavy Artillery, of the assault on Fort Stedman, Virginia, March 25, 1865. ….. 708

       

      • Report of Lieutenant Andrew Knox, First Connecticut Artillery, Battery No. 20, of artillery action at Petersburg, Virginia, February 25, 1865. ….. 709

       

      • Extract of report of Surgeon William Radcliffe De Witt, U. S. Volunteers, of division hospital operations during the Richmond, Virginia, campaign, January-April 1865. ….. 709

       

      • Unsigned report from the Seventh Wisconsin Infanttry on the Battle of Hatcher ‘s Run, Virginia, February 6-7, 1865. ….. 711

       

      • Journal of William Harvey, Company H, Eighteenth Virginia Infantry, of troop movement and battles, January 17-April 6, 1865. ….. 713

       

      • Postwar account of Brigadier-General Nathaniel Harrison Harris, C. S. Army, of the battle of Hatcher’s Run, Virginia, February 6, 1865. ….. 717

       

      • Postwar supplemental report of Major Jedediah Hotchkiss, Topographical Engineer, of operations, January 1-April 12, 1865. ….. 732 [Some Petersburg-related content]

       

      • Journal of Major-General Bushrod Rust Johnson, C. S. Army, March 15-April 16, 1865. ….. 744

       

      • Report of Major Conway Robinson Howard, Engineers Department, C. S. Army, of engineering plans for batteries in the vicinity of Petersburg, Virginia, February-March 1865. ….. 749

       

      • Account of Colonel Augustus Forsberg, Fifty-first Virginia Infantry, on operations in and around Petersburg, Virginia, February 1865. ….. 751

       

       

      MARCH 20-APRIL 9, 1865.— The Appomattox, Virginia, Campaign.

       

      • Report of Captain Charles E. Stubbs, Second Maine Battery, of operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 9, 1865. ….. 752

       

      • Report of Captain Ezekiel R. Mayo, Third Maine Battery, of operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 9, 1865. ….. 753

       

      • Report of Captain Charles W. White, Fourth Maine Battery, on operations in Virginia, March 29-April 9, 1865. ….. 753

       

      • Report of Lieutenant William H. Rogers, Sixth Maine Battery, on operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 9, 1865. ….. 754

       

      • Report of Captain Joseph W. B. Wright, Fourteenth Massachusetts Artillery, of operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 9, 1865. ….. 755

       

      • Report of Captain Stephen W. Dorsey, First Ohio Light Artillery, of operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1-3, 1865. ….. 756

       

      • Report of Captain John F. Campbell, First Pennsylvania Light Artillery, on operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 9, 1865. ….. 757

       

      • Report of Lieutenant Ezra K. Parker, First Rhode Island Light Artillery, on operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1-3, 1865. ….. 758

       

      • Report of Lieutenant Ezra K. Parker, First Rhode Island Light Artillery, of operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 3, 1865. ….. 759

       

      • Report of Captain Romeo H. Start, Third Vermont Battery Volunteers, on operations during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 29-April 3, 1865. ….. 760

       

      • Report of Brevet Brigadier-General Joseph Eldridge Hamblin, Sixty-fifth New York Infantry, commanding Second Brigade, First Division, Sixth Corps, in the operations in front of Fort Sedgwick, Virginia, April 2, 1865. ….. 762

       

      • Report of Brevet Major George Breck, Battery L, First New York Light Artillery, of action during the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, March 30-April 2, 1865. ….. 764

       

      • Postwar account of Colonel Thomas Mann Randolph Talcott, C. S. Engineer Troops, of events at Appomattox, Virginia, April 3, 1865. ….. 765

       

      • Report of Brigadier-General Walter Husted Stevens, C. S. Army, of the campaign leading to Appomattox Court-House, Virginia, April 2-9, 1865. ….. 767

       

      • Postwar extract of abstract report of Captain Thomas Jewett Goree, C. S. Army, of Lieutenant-General James Longstreet’s staff, of events at Appomattox, Virginia April 9, 1865. ….. 769

       

      • Account of Brigadier-General Henry Lewis Benning, C. S. Army, on the campaign leading to Appomattox Court-House, Virginia, April 1865. ….. 771

       

      • Report of Lieutenant-Colonel Briscoe Gerard Baldwin, C. S. Army, on the ordnance moved at Petersburg, Virginia, April 2-8, 1865. ….. 773

       

      • Report of Lieutenant-General James Longstreet, C. S. Army, of the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1-11, 1865. ….. 775

       

      • Report of Major General George Edward Pickett, C. S. Army, on the Battle of Five Forks, Virginia, April 1, 1865. ….. 778

       

      • Postwar account of Brigadier-General Joseph Brevard Kershaw, C. S. Army, on the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1865. ….. 786

       

      • Postwar account of Lieutenant-Colonel John Cheves Haskell, C. S. Army, on the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1865. ….. 787

       

      • Postwar account of Major-General John Brown Gordon, C. S. Army, of events at Appomattox, Virginia, April 9, 1865. ….. 793

       

      • Report of Major-General John Brown Gordon, C. S. Army, of the Apppomattox, Virginia, campaign. ….. 794

       

      • Report of Major-General Bryan Grimes, C. S. Army, of operations at Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 8-9, 1865. ….. 799

       

      • Report of John Willis Lea, Fifth North Carolina Infantry, of operations around Hatcher’s Run, Virginia, February 5-6, 1865. …..803

       

      • Communique of Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Edward Lightfoot, C. S. Army, of operations near Appomattox, Virginia, April 8, 1865. ….. 809

       

      • Report of Major-General Henry Heth, C. S. Army, of the engagements at Sutherland’s Station and Appomattox, Virginia, April 1-11, 1865. ….. 810

       

      • Report of Lieutenant-Colonel Eric Erson, Fifty-Second North Carolina, on the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1-11, 1865. ….. 812

       

      • Report of Brigadier-General John Rogers Cooke, C. S. Army, on the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 2, 1865. ….. 813

       

      • Diary of Captain John Franklin Heitman, Forty-eighth North Carolina Infantry, of operations at Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 4-15, 1865. ….. 815

       

      • Report of Brigadier-General William McComb, C. S. Army, on the Appomattox, Virginia, campaign, April 1865. ….. 816

       

      • Postwar account of Lieutenant-General Richard Heron Anderson, C. S. Army, of operations of Johnson’s and Hoke’ s Division, October 19, 1864-April 8, 1865. ….. 817

       

      • Report of Major-General William Mahone, C. S. Army, of the engagement at Cumberland Church, Virginia, April 3-11, 1865. ….. 822

       

      • Postwar account of Captain Herman Humphries Perry, Sorrel’s Brigade, C. S. Army, of the surrender at Appomattox, Virginia, April 9, 1865. ….. 823

       

      • Extract of abstract report of the Fauquier Artillery, commanded by Captain Robert Mackey Stribling, at Appomattox Court-House, Virginia, April 1865. ….. 827

       

      • Report of Major-General Fitzhugh Lee, C. S. Army, on the troops strength of the Cavalry Corps, March 27, 1865. ….. 828

       

      • Postwar account of Adjutant Robert Thruston Hubard, Jr., Third Virginia Cavalry, C. S. Army, on the skirmish near Five Forks, Virginia, March 30, 1865. ….. 829

       

      • Report of Major General William Henry Fitzhugh Lee, C. S. Army, on engagement at Dinwiddie Court-House, Virginia, March 1865. ….. 833

       

      • Recollections of Captain William Wilson Chamberlaine, First Corps Artillery, C. S. Army, on the Battle of Amelia Court-House, Virginia, April 5-9, 1865. ….. 835

       

      Source:

      1. Supplement to the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Part I, Reports, Vol. 7, pp. 697-702
      { 0 comments }

      P13BenningBde18640809FBConfederate Inspection Report:

      Benning’s Brigade, Field’s Division, First Corps, Army of Northern Virginia1

      August 9, 1864

      The Confederate Army of Northern Virginia produced inspection reports at approximately monthly intervals late in the Civil War.  Luckily, many of these reports have been preserved and are available on microfilm from the National Archives and Records Association. I have produced transcriptions of the key information from these reports. See the bottom of this page for freely downloadable transcriptions of most of these reports. This transcription is copyrighted by Brett Schulte and may not be distributed, changed, or reproduced in any manner without the written consent of the transcriber.

      M935 Roll #: 10

      Image # from Digitized Copy: 0035-0046.jpg

      Date of Inspection: August 9, 1864

      Commander: Colonel Dudley M. DuBose (of the 15th Georgia)

      Inspection Location: New Market Heights, north of Deep Bottom near the James River

      Aggregate Present & Absent: 1,963

      Aggregate Effective for the Field: 7122

      Officers and Men Present for Duty (PFD): 712

      Weapons: Enfield Rifles, Springfield Rifles, and Richmond Rifles

      Sub-Units:

      • 2nd Georgia, Lt. Col. William S. Shepherd, 172 officers and men PFD
      • 15th Georgia, Major Peter J. Shannon, 220 officers and men PFD
      • 17th Georgia, Lt. Colonel William A. Barden, 147 officers and men PFD
      • 20th Georgia, Captain Henry C. Mitchell, 173 officers and men PFD

      Downloadable Spreadsheet:

       

      Source/Notes:

      1. Confederate Inspection Report P-13: Benning’s Brigade, August 9, 1864; Inspection Reports and Related Records Received By the Inspection Branch in the Confederate Adjutant and Inspector General’s Office. (National Archives Microfilm Publication M935, Roll 10: Inspection Reports P-12 – 39-P-24); War Department Collection of Confederate Records, Record Group 109; National Archives Building, Washington, D.C.
      2. SOPO Editor’s Note: “Effectives” generally means men carrying muskets, so no commissioned officers are included.  “Present for Duty” includes commissioned officers.  So this number probably should be lower then the PFD.  Instead, the Inspector wrote the same number for both, obviously an error.  I did not accidentally make a typo.  The inspector typed it this way.
      { 2 comments }